| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
New law. Anyone caught participating in acts of terrorism, whether strapping a suicide bomb to you, or sponsoring, planning acts of terrorism ect, your families will be prosecuted along side you, or in your place if you're a suicide bomber. Only drastic measures will stop the threat of terrorism. If this doesn't stop it, then It will certainly slow it down
That's so extreme it might have been conceived in Tel Aviv.
How about instead conveying to Saudi Arabia, whom Trump and Hillary Clinton believe is the sponsor of ISIS, that should any other Britons be murdered at the hands of loons they've created then the consequences would be severe for the House of Saud? That's better than prosecuting innocent family members.
Quite possibly contrary to the Geneva Convention
And if we put them all in the same prison then they don't need to do all the online surveillance of everyoneOriginally Posted by ninianclark
Not possible while we are in the EU
Not sure on the family idea, but, if you are found guilty of any terrorist act in anyway shape of form, even handing out literature ( which seemed to have still been happening only a few weeks ago in the market on Moss side ), these people who the secret service know about, bring them in, investigate them, kick down doors and find them, then lock them up, no communication with the outside world, they will be no harm to us
we have over 3000 on a UK watch list, we cannot watch them all while they are on the streets, it would be slightly easier if they were locked up
I was watching the drama the excellent TV drama 3 girls , and found some comparisons, where a group of men ,groomed ,organised, controlled ,trafficked and carried out extreme acts ,using targeted vulnerable people, these incidents were reported to authorities years before ,with no action taken , interestingly you could suggest some comparisons of the same activities of grooming disenfranchised, isolated Muslims , to urge them into radicalism, again some of whom activities , were known, you cant make political gain out of alleged ineffective funded authorities. .
Do you think we just do away with the idea that we wait for someone to commit a crime before incarcerating them, use an algorithm to decide who is likely to and then lock them up based on that?
Sounds bad to me.
I see what you did thereAnd if we put them all in the same prison then they don't need to do all the online surveillance of everyone
So if I go onto google now and search 'how to make a bomb?' I should be locked up indefinitely?
Though I'm biased, I still believe my idea as part of the solution is the best. Put a stop to Saudi Arabia paying ISIS mercenaries, stop them from funding ISIS propaganda and stop them from arming ISIS murderers. I realise that flogging them weapons of all sorts provides lots of UK and USA jobs but pretending the emperor has no clothes is surreal.
But wouldn't it just be cheaper to indefinitely lock up Muslims who look a bit dodgy and harass/threaten their families?
People who advocate the restitution of the death penalty do so with an unspoken qualification which is providing they or someone they care about don't swing in error. It's the same when they approve of totalitarian measures applied to others as they believe it would never impact them.
So if I go onto google now and search 'how to make a child abuse?' I should be locked up indefinitely?
prawn cocktail pringles
you might find that i said " if you are found guilty of any terrorist act in anyway shape of form, even handing out literature "
where may i ask did i say " incarcerating them before they commit a crime " ? ? ?
The Lilly left will never let it happen
I was referring to the 3000 people on the 'watchlist' that you appear to want locked up indefinitely without knowing what led them to be on the 'watchlist' in the first place (or knowing whether or not they have committed a crime).
Internment would only strengthen ISIS' hand, "Look at these Westerners, punishing us for doing Allah's work" etc etc
Strange comment. I don't know of any political party in the UK suggesting doing this.The Lilly left will never let it happen
once again, i never said that at all, the precursor to that statement said " if you are found guilty of any terrorist act in anyway shape of form, even handing out literature "
So Only if they have been found guilty of anything terror related, anything means, supporting in anyway, even handing out literature
Col Richard Kemp (former head of Cobra) said the same sort of thing on the Nicky Campbell show the other day so I doubt it will be long before it is suggested, he went as far as saying..
“Deport People We Don't Like, Even When We Can't Prove They've Done Anything Wrong!”
You're saying you would be happy for your child to be treated like a dog, and you'd give up your right to complain about, if the chances of being in a terrorist attack dropped from one in a million to zero?
Fair play, that's one of the most insane and hysterical views that I've ever seen shared on here.
Give it time.
So you don't want to lock up everyone on the watchlist to make it easier to watch them then? I must be seeing things.
Doh, I must have let myself down again.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
