Quote Originally Posted by Croesy Blue View Post

You can't have security for the sake of it if there's no credible threat. The cost and benefits have to be weighed up and currently youd say there is zero benefit even when ignoring the other arguments made in this thread.
So we give rural areas more armed officers after we have experienced a rural area killing spree

we need to get away from the " lets deal with a issue after it has become one " thinking, and maybe tackle the issue head on

The old saying " Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted " is fairly apt here