Swansea want 50 million pounds for Gylfi Sigurdsson

[Rjk]

So if we'd all take Siggurdson over Barkley then why should Swansea accept less than Everton, reportedly, want for Barkley?

50 million shows how stupidly inflated the UK market is but if you're playing by stupid rules you best not lose by them.

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/f...-a7837516.html


https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/diffe...-part-one/amp/

As these two articles seem to show, sigurdssons main asset these days is his delivery from set pieces. Take that away and he's pretty average. Some parallels with Whitts there probably.

For £50 million you want more than just someone to take the free kicks.

Barkley isn't worth £50 million either, but I'd probably have him over sigurdsson.