| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
It's for the benefit of the brainwashed folks who need to see something attributed to a recognised media organisation, even if it is the DM or Fox they are the only ones who will go against the globalist propaganda organisations such as the New York Times, Washington Post, BBC, CNN, etc.Originally Posted by CardiffIrish2
Why, specifically,is the Daily Mailv- specifically the Daily Mail - "against globalism or globalist propaganda"?
I would love a straight, consise, direct answer to that, just a couple of lines but with some actual flesh on the bone.
Could you do that maybe? It might help a lot of people understand.
They supported Brexit. In fact, David Cameron secretly tried to get the editor fired, but the ownwer of the Daily Mail told Cameron that he had given his editor editorial independence, and he couldn't interfere.
Alternatively you could just read some of their articles to quickly get a grasp of their viewpoint
I agree with you on this. I limit myself to corporate media links too (along with occasional Russian RT ones) for the same reasons you do. I also concur with your Fox and the Daily Mail remarks.
The Mail had secret meetings with May ahead of the election and were her biggest supporters - yet you told us she is a mason and an operative of the banks to stop brexit happening.They supported Brexit. In fact, David Cameron secretly tried to get the editor fired, but the ownwer of the Daily Mail told Cameron that he had given his editor editorial independence, and he couldn't interfere.
Alternatively you could just read some of their articles to quickly get a grasp of their viewpoint
Ok pizzagate again, this doesn't answer my question. Why can't someone be against human trafficking and also against trump?
The Mail are hardly going to get behind Corbyn
Let me get this straight, you've got two completely opposite theories but you're not going to conclude that at least one is wrong?The Mail are hardly going to get behind Corbyn
Well she obviously can't stay in Europe and leave Europe, so how is she going to please the Daily Mail and the banks? Could there be a middle option? She is in a bit of a pickle if you ask me, but still desperate to be in charge, so I think she may have a plan ...
Spill the beans...
stop it, my sides are hurting
"oh .. here's another beauty" ..
Russia Today is directly funded by the Russion state.
Fox is owned by Murdoch
Daily Mail is a long standing national joke.
FFS ..
It's easy to conclude that, when pressed, there's rarely any straight answers from many (not all) of the 'self-professed ITK's' who post here!
It's also rather too easy to wonder if most of those who desire (for what it's worth!) to appear so very wise and noddngly ITK - and who are often rather patronising toward the rest of 'us poor ignorant fools' - are actually the ones chugging very desperately hard on whatever fits in with the hobby horse they ride, which they now cannot begin to dismount, nor turn.
What a vacuous individual you arestop it, my sides are hurting
Who was she working for?
The truth is the truth no matter who reports it. Like I said I post MSM links for the benefit of those who rely on the MSM for their world view. Obviously I have seen the information elsewhere, and I can assure you that these links are not for my benefit!"oh .. here's another beauty" ..
Russia Today is directly funded by the Russion state.
Fox is owned by Murdoch
Daily Mail is a long standing national joke.
FFS ..
It's easy to conclude that, when pressed, there's rarely any straight answers from many (not all) of the 'self-professed ITK's' who post here!
It's also rather too easy to wonder if most of those who desire (for what it's worth!) to appear so very wise and noddngly ITK - and who are often rather patronising toward the rest of 'us poor ignorant fools' - are actually the ones chugging very desperately hard on whatever fits in with the hobby horse they ride, which they now cannot begin to dismount, nor turn.
That's interesting, Homeland Security have confirmed that the Russian lawyer was on a B1/B2 nonimmigrant visa for the meeting, but the truth is the truth no matter who reports it, isn't that right Gulley?
Keep digging, you'll get there eventually
PS it would help if you took those blinkers off!
The Department of Homeland Security are fake news too, eh?
Well done, good investigatingI hope you won't stop there. Why did sobebody on a B1/B2 visa have so many influencial friends in Washington? And why was a self proclaimed anti-Trumper offering opposition research to the Trump team? Oh yeah, who was she actually working for? With your tremendous powers of deduction, we should have this matter put to bed in next to know time
better than being a knob jockeyWhat a vacuous individual you are
You just proved my pointbetter than being a knob jockey
Okeydokey !
really?? you're a strange motherfeckerYou just proved my point
The question really is why were the trump team enthusiastically accepting the help that they knew was from Putin.Well done, good investigating
Carry on mate, whatever turns you onreally?? you're a strange motherfecker
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote