Reply With QuoteThe Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 made it legal to propagandize the American public in order to sway public opinion. There would be no point in having a law like this if you didn't intend to use it.
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Skip to 27:00Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R
Mental.
The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 made it legal to propagandize the American public in order to sway public opinion. There would be no point in having a law like this if you didn't intend to use it.
Yep, another deluded ****wit talking about his false flags denying the bleeding obvious as it doesn't fit in with his bullshit.
He looks like a psychotic Terry McDermott too
Yep, let's stick to the Washington Post/New York Times/CNN narrative hey, they are the only ones who have access to the real truth
He's denied a mass murder. He's a ****wit end of.Yep, let's stick to the Washington Post/New York Times/CNN narrative hey, they are the only ones who have access to the real truth
He also brought down the old Soviet Union and ended the Cold War, what a ****ing ****wit
The parents of those kids have surely been through enough, but some still get hassled and abused (online and in person). Imagine going through the worst hell and losing your precious child, and getting death threats because some think the death of your child was a hoax and a false flag.
Now imagine being one of the c**ts who propagate that, not caring of what pain it causes grieving parents because you have a nice little clique of online followers. It's pretty hard to imagine being that person.
Now imagine being a world expert with a proven track record specialising in the implementation of propaganda, psyops, false-flags, psychological warfare, regime change, covert policy change, etc, and having many government contacts in the secret services due to spending countless years working directly for numerous presidents.
No forget all that, let's listen to lardy instead, the oracle of all truth, the world expert on everything. lardy speaks, we listen
Simple question for you do you think Sandy Hook happened ?Now imagine being a world expert with a proven track record specialising in the implementation of propaganda, psyops, false-flags, psychological warfare, regime change, covert policy change, etc, and having many government contacts in the secret services due to spending countless years working directly for numerous presidents.
No forget all that, let's listen to lardy instead, the oracle of all truth, the world expert on everything. lardy speaks, we listen
Ah, I wish I was, alas I'm just a regular guy who performs more due diligence on the right wing crap that you post than you do yourself.
No forget all that, let's listen to lardy instead, the oracle of all truth, the world expert on everything. lardy speaks, we listen
Have you opened up google maps and seen that Charlotte, NC is not the same as Charlottesville, Virginia yet?
Now imagine being a world expert with a proven track record specialising in the implementation of propaganda, psyops, false-flags, psychological warfare, regime change, covert policy change, etc, and having many government contacts in the secret services due to spending countless years working directly for numerous presidents.
No forget all that, let's listen to lardy instead, the oracle of all truth, the world expert on everything. lardy speaks, we listenhttps://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.t...-victim-father
It's not a simple question
I'm not right-wing, I am centre-left, but not radical-left like youAh, I wish I was, alas I'm just a regular guy who performs more due diligence on the right wing crap that you post than you do yourself.
Have you opened up google maps and seen that Charlotte, NC is not the same as Charlottesville, Virginia yet?
BTW Crowds On Demand operate nationally, so your attempt to discredit them failed.
Right, so they recruited a big crowd by advertising in a city 275 miles away - and paying the Uber fares for everyone to get there?I'm not right-wing, I am centre-left, but not radical-left like you
BTW Crowds On Demand operate nationally, so your attempt to discredit them failed.
I can use google too, that was doing the rounds with "Will Charlotte be next?" as a tagline, but you seemed to have missed that bit in your excitement. Just read things more thoroughly and you won't look so silly!
They bus all those rent-a-mobs to wherever the action is, they also have offices in New York and Washington DCRight, so they recruited a big crowd by advertising in a city 275 miles away - and paying the Uber fares for everyone to get there?
I can use google too, that was doing the rounds with "Will Charlotte be next?" as a tagline, but you seemed to have missed that bit in your excitement. Just read things more thoroughly and you won't look so silly!
So you'll have some better proof than "same country" right?They bus all those rent-a-mobs to wherever the action is, they also have offices in New York and Washington DC
So I guess those dead kids were paid actors as well? And the "grieving parents" were Oscar nominees?It's not a simple question
Denying a mass murder just so you can fit your anti "mainstream media" narrative and can peddle this right wing conspiracy theorist bullshit is mental
In case you haven't been following the thread, it was an expert in phychological operations and false flags who called it out, a person who btw carried out these kinds of operations on behalf of 4 previous US presidents. So in the grand scheme of things, who am I to doubt the veracity of his words?
And as per usual, you resort to personal attacks when trying to make something align with your own personal beliefs. It's called confirmation bias, and it is easily cured by simply opening your eyes
In case you haven't been following the thread, it was an expert in phychological operations and false flags who called it out, a person who btw carried out these kinds of operations on behalf of 4 previous US presidents. So in the grand scheme of things, who am I to doubt the veracity of his words?
And as per usual, you resort to personal attacks when trying to make something align with your own personal beliefs. It's called confirmation bias, and it is easily cured by simply opening your eyes
He may be all the things you say and no doubt he is a clever person.
But he's completely and utterly wide of the mark to the point of causing gross offence.
I can't believe there are deniers of this, is utterly insane to suggest that Sandyhook didn't happen.
I am not in a position to come to a definative conclusion one way or the other, and I get your point about causing gross offence, but if any of these attrocities are ever proven to be false flags there will be a huge meltdown amonst the general population. It would be a gross offence against people's intelligence and a catastrophic breach of trust.
Unfortunately, if Trump does ever get hold of this kind of info, I think he is going to use it at some point judging by his demeanour and his body language.
This is a bit awkward, but shall we give the school caretaker the benefit of the doubt, and put it all down to a case of bad nerves when speaking in public?
Just because someone is an expert at something doesn't mean they're 100% right all the time, what he said was grotesque and I'd say arguing that the 3rd largest mass-shooting in US history never happened at best makes him an unreliable source and at worst makes him a complete lunaticIn case you haven't been following the thread, it was an expert in phychological operations and false flags who called it out, a person who btw carried out these kinds of operations on behalf of 4 previous US presidents. So in the grand scheme of things, who am I to doubt the veracity of his words?
And as per usual, you resort to personal attacks when trying to make something align with your own personal beliefs. It's called confirmation bias, and it is easily cured by simply opening your eyes
"Personal attack"? Really? Is saying that its mental that you'd deny a mass murder really a "personal attack"?
If anyone has their "eyes shut" here it's you. Evidence has been provided by many in this thread and yet you refuse to accept it as it doesn't fit into your anti "mainstream media" viewpoint
There's also plenty of evidence out there to show Sandy Hook was open and the "school wasn't in operation" theory has been debunked, unfortunately Sandy Hook did happen, its way too big of a tragedy to not have happened
Well I haven't denied anything have I, so I guess that makes you a little bit mental for trying to say that I have
And what evidence has been provided by many in this thread? It's mostly hearsay, anonymous sources and conjecture.
Replace the word 'lardy' with any other person who has an opinion to voice - including yourself.
No forget all that, let's listen to lardy instead, the oracle of all truth, the world expert on everything. lardy speaks, we listen
Some might say - particularly yourself.
Well, that's pretty much all anyone drags on the the table, and that includes all of us. You too.Well I haven't denied anything have I, so I guess that makes you a little bit mental for trying to say that I have
And what evidence has been provided by many in this thread? It's mostly hearsay, anonymous sources and conjecture.
Posting Permissions