The Donald Trump thread

[Sgt. Pepper]

I will make one prediction especially for you. Trump is going to go down as either the greatest President in US history, or the worst. He will not occupy any other position.

Wont he just use the adjective 'greatest' either way, whatever happens? ;)

He's not looking too great tonight. Again.

Here is President Greatest making America Great - again.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40952820

^^ Fake News, Fake News, Fake News.

[Sgt. Pepper]

Bloody Murdoch / Fox meddling in global politics?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40940931

Bannon is not my kind of guy, but he is a man with brains and a particular vision and Trump certainly owes him a lot of gratitude.

But WTF is Murdock doing telling a President what to do ?

"The anti-Bannon contingent includes Rupert Murdoch, the Fox News founder who's repeatedly lobbied the president, according to the New York Times, for the strategist to be sacked."

^^ NYTimes via BBC - Fake News, Fake News.

[Wales-Bales]

Bloody Murdoch / Fox meddling in global politics?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40940931

Bannon is not my kind of guy, but he is a man with brains and a particular vision and Trump certainly owes him a lot of gratitude.

But WTF is Murdock doing telling a President what to do ?

"The anti-Bannon contingent includes Rupert Murdoch, the Fox News founder who's repeatedly lobbied the president, according to the New York Times, for the strategist to be sacked."

^^ NYTimes via BBC - Fake News, Fake News.

I love the BBC they are the best at what they do. They even sent their former Director-General over to the New York Times as CEO to show them how to do what they do.

[Mrs Steve R]

I love the BBC they are the best at what they do. They even sent their former Director-General over to the New York Times as CEO to show them how to do what they do.

Yes, lying.

[Sgt. Pepper]

While I often 'distrust' the veracity of BBC news, to be clear here - ^^ are you both stating that the contents of that BBC article is a lie, based on a NY Times lie?

So, Bannon is not teetering on the edge of favour, and Murdoch is not seeking to influence the Presidents agenda?

[Sgt. Pepper]

I love the BBC they are the best at what they do. They even sent their former Director-General over to the New York Times as CEO to show them how to do what they do.

My word! - is that true? Where did you read that?

[Mrs Steve R]

While I often 'distrust' the veracity of BBC news, to be clear here - ^^ are you both stating that the contents of that BBC article is a lie, based on a NY Times lie?

So, Bannon is not teetering on the edge of favour, and Murdoch is not seeking to influence the Presidents agenda?

I was just talking about them in general.

[Wales-Bales]

While I often 'distrust' the veracity of BBC news, to be clear here - ^^ are you both stating that the contents of that BBC article is a lie, based on a NY Times lie?

So, Bannon is not teetering on the edge of favour, and Murdoch is not seeking to influence the Presidents agenda?

Destroy Bannon to destroy Trump. It's another good plan

BTW how does Murdoch get inside everybody's back door? I hope his kids don't inherit the same power.

[the other bob wilson]

Not exactly clinging on I am comparing his actions against predicted outcomes, but Trump is a slippery character and he doesn't give much away! I'm glad I'm not up against him, it would do my head in. I feel sorry for Hillary, Soros, Obama, and that lot though, cos they are not facing a conventional political operator here.

Slippery? That's the last thing he is. One day he sticks to the pre arranged script, the next day he completely contradicts himself in a more "off the cuff" setting where what you get is what he really thinks, as opposed to what he is supposed to think. He's slippery when it comes to things like paying his taxes, but, although I suppose this could be taken as a compliment in some ways, most of the time you get to see the real Trump in all of his "glory", trouble is, as mentioned above, I find the real Trump morally repugnant.

[Sgt. Pepper]

Well, what is going on with Chief Advisor Bannon?
Sounds like he got 'caught out'. Odd, for such an experienced player.
No point in linking any of the MSM sources.

[lardy]

Well, what is going on with Chief Advisor Bannon?
Sounds like he got 'caught out'. Odd, for such an experienced player.
No point in linking any of the MSM sources.

It's being said he wasn't aware it was an interview. After The Mooch thing (blimey, remember him from two decades ago?) it's hard to believe anyone could get caught out again.

One things for sure, they don't play by the book in White House 17.

[Sgt. Pepper]

Apparently he called a journalist at The American Prospect - supposedly a central/liberal publication and spilled some beans.
Absolutely bizarre, at first glance.

Not sure who controls the Prospect, its supposedly neutral. Though they did nearly go under a couple of years back, and sought crowd funding, which apparently exceeded expectations.

So, a bit of a surprise as it stands.
Will there be more from Bannonman or Trumpnado shortly.. Surely so.

[Dr Lecter]

No posts from Gluey for nearly 14 hours?

Must be overseas shagging the entire Kardashian family.


Lucky git.

[Mrs Steve R]

No posts from Gluey for nearly 14 hours?

Must be overseas shagging the entire Kardashian family.


Lucky git.

I hope he is.

[Wales-Bales]

No posts from Gluey for nearly 14 hours?

Must be overseas shagging the entire Kardashian family.


Lucky git.

You just ruined my lunch!

[Wales-Bales]

Bannon seems like he is a very clever man

http://prospect.org/article/steve-bannon-unrepentant

[Wales-Bales]

Here is the original China article

http://prospect.org/article/us-vs-no...a-winner-china

[Wales-Bales]

After TheDC broke the news of the meeting, Rohrabacher put out a statement in which he said Assange “emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.” The three met for three hours and Rohrabacher is the first congressman to have visited the WikiLeaks founder.

A press release from the California congressman’s office stated that Rohrabacher “plans to divulge more of what he found directly to President Trump.”

Republican Congressman Meets With WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/16/ex...ulian-assange/

[Wales-Bales]

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/stat...79895430742016

"Sean Hannity‏Verified account @seanhannity
Stay tuned. Major, multiple Tick Tocks. 3 different fronts--MAJOR!! Patience, pieces are all falling in place."

Wassup guys?

[Wales-Bales]

More on the Assange meeting

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecur...d-not-leak-him

[lardy]

Corbyn and Trump have a lot in common. While popular with the general public, the establishment don't want them anywhere near the ruling government.

Doesn't trump have startlingly low approval ratings?

[Wales-Bales]

Doesn't trump have startlingly low approval ratings?

The fake ones or the real ones?

[lardy]

The fake ones or the real ones?

Textbook.

[Wales-Bales]

Well, what is going on with Chief Advisor Bannon?
Sounds like he got 'caught out'. Odd, for such an experienced player.
No point in linking any of the MSM sources.

If it's what I think it is, then this is huge. I don't think Bannon was 'caught out', rather 'they' were caught out. And to rub salt into their wounds, the Progressive backed MSM obliged by plastering the story all over the front pages!

[cyril evans awaydays]

If it's what I think it is, then this is huge. I don't think Bannon was 'caught out', rather 'they' were caught out. And to rub salt into their wounds, the Progressive backed MSM obliged by plastering the story all over the front pages!

What do you think it is?