+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
State department that Clinton had control of at the time denied requests for additional security at the Embassy.
Maybe people hate Clinton because she's a bs artist. Husband **** around with interns? Hey, never mind divorcing the bum, carry on with a sham marriage because that feeds into your own political machinations.
Hillary rode the sentiment of the democrats, "hey, we've had a black president, now let's have a female one".
Any competent democratic candidate would have won against Trump. Sadly, it was Hillary running.
One thing you can say about the Democrats is they have very good gatekeepers, and they have completely coopted the DC political machine. Their holdovers are still running or disrupting most government departments and law enforcement/intel agencies. Working hand-in-hand with the MSM and high profile media personalities, they are still a formidable force when it comes to manipulating public opinion.
You likened the election to a popularity contest, highlighted she lost to trump and described her as "shit" which is usually a comment on her capability rather than her performance. In turn I suggested she is dislikeable but trump, the other competitor, is a worse leader in terms of capability.
I'm not saying you support trump (nothing in your post to say that) but my post isn't unrelated to your starting comment. I just extended the points we were discussing slightly.
Then how come trump is president? How come 32 states out of 50 have a republican controlled house AND senate. How come 34 out of 50 states have Republican governors? Why do all the poorest states vote Republican? Why do so many people believe the "MSM" make up stories about Trump? Who do you think made "MSM" a thing? It wasn't the Democratic Party. The Republican party's distraction and manipulation tactics are so effective people don't even know they're being manipulated.
Trump will be out soon enough and not even his 4 star general Kelly's lies will be able to save him.
Your use of the term RINO just goes to show how easily manipulated you are. The biggest RINO of them all is Trump. The second is Pence, the religious zealot. Those in his own party who oppose him are Republicans in the true sense. The white supremacist, far right millionaires (WHO ACTUALLY RUN MEDIA OUTLETS) are not the Republican Party. They are the the manipulators and purveyors of fake news. Don't fall for their lies.
OK, you (understandably) seem to have lost your enthusiasm for this thread so here's a list of Conservative Review's top 10 Republicans In Name Only, their length of service to the Republican Party and the percentage of times they vote along Trump lines.
1. John McCain. Senator from AZ. 30 years - 83.3%
2. Lisa Murkowski. Senator from AK. 14 years - 85.7%
3. Susan Collins. Senator from ME. 20 years - 80%
4. Mitch McConnell. Senator from K. 32 years - 95.9%
5. Orrin Hatch. Senator from UT. 40 years - 96%
6. Lamar Alexander. Senator from TN. 14 years - 93.8%
7. Lindsey Graham. Senator from SC. 14 years - 90%
8. Jeff Flake. Senator from AZ. 4 years - 91.7%
9. Paul Ryan. Representative from WI. 18 years - 100%
10. Kevin McCarthy. Representative from CA. 10 years - 97.9%
Sources: fivethirtyeight.com, conservativereview.com
TBF there isn't much difference between Clinton, Bush and Obama, they are pretty much the same party, just like Blair and Cameron were. Everything run smoothly when new players take over. When people like Trump and Corbyn threaten the established power, things tend to get a little hostile, with attacks happening even within their own parties.
If you say so
GOP Rep. Ron DeSantis revealed Republican leadership blocked him and others from investigating the Clinton-Uranium One deal!
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017...vidence-video/
If we accept that you are right about the manipulation of the MSM, are you saying that the manipulation only goes on with one of the two sides in the conflict you are obsessed with? Surely anyone who believes that one side is pure evil and the other is squeaky clean is either naive or a fool, so I assume you accept there is manipulation on both sides? That being the case, that's some claim you make about not being easily manipulated.
Yep, there is manipulation on both sides, and a hell of lot of corruption too. I always look at opposing views and the underlying facts before I jump in on any particular topic. There are also many things I am not sure about, and you won't find me arguing the point so vigourously on such matters.
I've been watching the Russia events for a while now, and I have always said the Trump accusations were mostlly fabricated or a fishing expedition. I feel pretty confident about that. Do you remember the FISA warrants and phoney pee dossier? The recent developments in the Uranium One case are compelling IMO, and actually help to explain the reason for the Trump/Russia narrative.
I find this lady in the video below very bombastic, but she is on point with her observations here, and it is a good recap of current events regarding Russian interference and collusion. Naturally I will get ribbed for quoting Fox as a reference, but there are only a few people covering this story (why?), so I have little choice in the matter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkJ_ZHpOdxc
Don’t waste your breath. He won’t respond about this. It’s what he does. He posts endlessly about his agenda to show how much cleverer than everyone else he is.. Then when someone tries to get him to commit to something or tie him down to a factual argument he has two methods - either go off on a tangent or revert to “I’m just an observer, let’s wait and see how things play out”
Basically he hasn’t got a clue.