Originally Posted by
ninianclark
Agreed -
* You couldnt vote for the status quo - as the 5 presidents report outlined all the big changes they were planning - EU army, TTIP, expansion of 5 more countries (each unemployment levels of over 25%) and still NO control of immigrationm levels - like we used to have pre Maastricht treaty.
* All sides did state that leaving the EU meant leaving the single market - whether people voted realising that is up for debate - but it was mentioned constantly.
* Arrogant Westminster bubble politicians of ALL sides are living some sort of dream - try telling Labour voters in deprived areas that people under cutting wages, and a steady supply of cheaper Labour means they wont progress in life. School places, Dr appointment times increased etc. Compare that to conservative Leave supporters who think there is a better life outside the EU - based on incorrect figures (like the Gold affecting the trade figures - as stated above)
* People voted not economic grounds but on political grounds, they were told it may make the economy worse - they still voted Leave.
The overwhelming thoughts I get on this is that people want to be in Europe, trading with other nation states freely, with a standard set of rules and regs to make it easier to trade and should we want to move to France - we need to get the 'ok come in' approval of the French Govt.
What we dont want is unfettered access of the 500 million people in the EU, the ability to stay who comes in and out - using a system that is fair for anyone (including non EU citizens) we want Indian Dr's, American business people, Kenyan farmers products.
The EU wont change just for us though (obviously) - and the unelected EU commission cant be changed - they think they are above the individual members states.
What we end up with is anyone's guess - and I'm still not sure if it was the right or wrong decision - which is why I couldnt make my mind up which way to vote.