+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
He just doesn’t get it does he?
What a **** of a man fair play, posing with thumbs up
https://mobile.twitter.com/i/web/sta...34435613605888
Maybe I’m being too hard on him, I mean maybe he’s revived his latest endorsement from his mates in the NRA and he can’t contain himself
The Media Stopped Reporting The Russia Collusion Story Because They Helped Create It
Half the country wants to know why the press won’t cover the growing scandal now implicating the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice, and threatening to reach the State Department, Central Intelligence Agency, and perhaps even the Obama White House.
After all, the release last week of a less-redacted version of Sens. Charles Grassley and Lindsey Graham’s January 4 letter showed that the FBI secured a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant to search the communications of a Trump campaign adviser based on a piece of opposition research paid for by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. The Fourth Amendment rights of an American citizen were violated to allow one political party to spy on another.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/15/...helped-create/
It's the Donald Trump thread, not the "Let's all slavishly tow the Trump line" thread - yet you've been doing that for at least two years while claiming to be on the fence about him. Your posts, on the subject of this thread at least, are not balanced in the slightest - mine aren't either, but, then I've never made any spurious claims of impartiality when it comes to the man.
I still have my doubts about Trump as a person, but what I have been saying from the very begining is that there was no Trump Russia Collusion, it was all a setup and the media was complicit. As it happens this is exactly how things are turning out, so in that sense I have been very balanced, looking at the facts and making a judgement. Now there are others on here who have continously promoted the Trump Russia Collusion story, and up until this moment they still believe it is true!
The Michael Flynn guilty plea stinks to high-heaven
Former Trump National Security Adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to providing false information to FBI agent in December and the more we learn about the events leading up to that plea, the more it stinks to high-heaven.
Byron York’s recent article at the Washington Examiner reveals that then-FBI DIrector James Comey testified that the agents who conducted the interview of Flynn did not think he had lied to them.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...s-high-heaven/
A few stories on t’internet about Rick Gates changing his plea to guilty.
For what I wonder eh....
Journalist who gets more right than he gets wrong, as opposed to your luvvies at the New York Times & Washington Post
The greatest source of info is t'internet if you know your way around and have your wits about you. Of course you have to consider all sources of information to be false when you first encounter them, and then attempt to prove their correctness, but don't be that person who swallows everything a favourite news outlet throws at you.
Many investigations are still ongoing, so you will have to wait for the official version. You seem like a patient guy, you waited over a year to find out there was no Trump Russia Collusion, while this outcome was common knowledge on the internet since before the 2016 US election. Hang in there buddy, all will be revealed eventually in a manner that pleases you
How A Plea Reversal From Michael Flynn Could Uncover More Federal Corruption
On Friday, Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order in United States v. Flynn that, while widely unnoticed, reveals something fascinating: A motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works.
Just a week ago, and thus before Sullivan quietly directed Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team to provide Flynn’s attorneys “any exculpatory evidence,” Washington Examiner columnist Byron York detailed the oddities of Flynn’s case. The next day, former assistant U.S. attorney and National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy connected more of the questionable dots. York added even more details a couple of days later. Together these articles provide the backdrop necessary to understand the significance of Sullivan’s order on Friday.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/19/...al-corruption/
I have waited patiently for anything other than the blusterous bull of Pizzagate, Sandy Hook, 7th Floor, Seth Rich, missing texts, Imran Awan, Uranium One, Nunes, the Secret Society that you have peppered this board with over that period so awaiting Mueller to continue his work whilst your hero Trump gets more and more hysterical is no great burden.
Apparently there is consideration to arming teachers. This could be controversial he says.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1G51QY
I mean it’s been not like Teachers haven’t got enough to do having to strap a gun to themeselves whilst doing marking.
What an utter demented c u n t fair play
Still a work in progress, but a comprehensive timeline regarding Trump and the Russian collusion story.
https://sharylattkisson.com/2018/02/...rump-timeline/