Why on Earth would any idiot believe such a ludicrous story?
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Why on earth would anyone vote for this idiot who clearly hates this country.
Why on Earth would any idiot believe such a ludicrous story?
I would vote for him over the capitalist Tory scum anytime
I wouldn't vote for him as he is pro - brexit. Simple !
Will make it easier for his Russian pals to march in when we are little Britain all alone.
Don't understand all the fuss, it's quite clear where his politics and allegiances are ,he's not hidden them ,and the story supports that , so let's just move on, vote for him or not ,it's that bloody simple
Not the thread's theme but can't be bothered to create a new one. My doom antenna, which is finely tuned, is humming. I predict it's going to kick-off big time in Syria within the next three days. If, and it's a big if, Russia directly engages Yanks or Ashkenazi forces in Assad's defence then we're on for the big one, else a huge Middle East conflict will ensue as Syria/Iran won't allow the partition of the country without a fight.
I cringe at Corbyn quite regularly but the plan since 2010 has failed at almost every turn. The ideology has failed in practice, trickle down is a myth, QE hasn't worked (unless the aim was to hand extra cash to the richest people), this has led to almost every one of their own targets being missed. So what do we do? Everyone who dismisses this governments (including 2010-now) approach based on factual evidence is an idiot now?
- Mandatory deselection is talked about a lot but I don't actually think the appetite for it is over egged.
- Labour would need a majority in the house to have anything like the power you are suggesting (if they gut the party of popular constituency MP's then they almost certainly wouldn't gain one).
Give it a few years and he'll be out of the way, and this experimental period of immaturity and silliness in British politics will be over. Given time, he will be reviled and laughed at even more than Michael Foot or the hapless Gordon Brown.
It's just a phase that's all. Just a phase. Just a like a fancy new crepe shop that pops up. People think "Oooh that's new let's give it a try." Responses range from "ooh lovely" to "uuurgh that's odd". And eventually the fad or phase goes away. Years later people wonder what the fuss was all about. The only people that don't need to experiment are the ones who know it isn't new and was done all before, decades ago, and resulted in disaster. To them, it is money for old rope. To those who don't remember it they think it's new or novelty. But it's just a phase. Give it time and one way or another, most will come to their senses and he'll barely figure in the annals of history.
The founder and chairman of momentum is Jewish. You can read a lot about him in the right wing tabloid press, he is typified as a money grabbing Jewish champagne socialist (which obviously isn't anti-Semitic at all).
Which bits of the manifesto were far-left in your opinion? Labour are beyond far left at the minute so it isn't a difficult question for you to answer.
I am not sure Mr Lansman had much control over where he went to school. I am also not sure what the point of any of that is. I know nothing of the inner workings of the Labour party as i am not a member, they probably do have a problem. It feels like you were trying to avoid the question.
I'll try again.
Which bits of the manifesto were far-left in your opinion? Labour are beyond far left at the minute so it isn't a difficult question for you to answer.
This one that was for ninianclark:
I hear very often that Labour are a far left party, I don't really see it. There are questions to be asked of it's leadership and momentum certainly but beyond John McDonnell saying the occasional silly thing (that they could never realistically put into practice as government) the majority of what they push are popular ideas (centre/left of centre).Which bits of the manifesto were far-left in your opinion? Labour are beyond far left at the minute so it isn't a difficult question for you to answer.
This approach is becoming really common in politics (and really really common on here), presenting someones opinion as polarised for effect - Far right/Far left, it is the main thing that inhibits meaningful debate.