+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Won't Trump's wall be built by then
The US/Mexico/Canada bid beat Morrocco convincingly in every area, should be a great World Cup
It's going to be an expensive trip (massively, massively expensive for fans who want to do more than one game) but enlarging the tournament means fewer countries can host as individuals and more group efforts will be made. Do three teams now qualify as hosts? That seems wrong.
For CONCACAF, they just get less qualifying spots (so it doesn't impact any of the other federations). There are so many spots now I don't think it's a huge deal.
The qualifying spots are said to look like:
AFC (Asia) – eight places (up from 4.5)
Caf (Africa) – nine places (up from 5)
Concacaf (North and Central America) – six places, of which three go to hosts (up from 3.5)
Conmebol (South America) – six places (up from 4.5)
OFC (Oceania) – one place (up from 0.5)
Uefa (Europe) – 16 places (up from 13)
In addition there will be two final spots available from a new World Cup play-off mini-tournament.
https://www.theguardian.com/football...ll-work-united
Whats crazy is that with 48 teams we are looking at groups of 3 teams, with the top 2 advancing to the knockout stages. As the article states, that could lead to all kinds of scenarios as the schedule won't be balanced in the group (one team would be coming off playing a match playing a team that hasn't played yet). I do think more of a knockout stage is a good thing though.
Oh yeah.... the BBC made the same mistake a while back, but plenty argued they were right and I was wrong.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-43919120
Does all three automatic qualify,if so let’s get in with England when they next apply.
Someone sorted the groups based on current rankings, we'd have Canada & Burkina Faso!
Concacaf 6 places?!
Aren't there only about 7 teams
Does that mean each of the 3 countries qualify automatically as hosts