| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
The Kavanaugh accusations made under penalty of perjury. Status is ongoing. Senator Feinstein was pulling the strings.Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
The Democrats opened some kind of legal case. Which Democrats and what is the status of the case?
Again you said:
The Democrats opened this case and its ongoing, so they only have themselves to blame.
Post something....anything factual that supports your latest hyperbole!
The hearing was held in a legal setting. They lied, got caught and are now facing the consequences. The Democrats were too clever by half on this one and it backfired terribly. Perjury is a serious offence.
All bull as usual then!
It was a Democratic senator who requested the hearing and subsequent enquiry.
NBC News raises eyebrows by sitting on info that contradicted Michael Avenatti client's gang rape claim
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...venatti-client
===
New questions raised about Avenatti claims regarding Kavanaugh
"I do not like that he twisted my words," one woman says of lawyer Michael Avenatti.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jus...anaugh-n924596
So NBC could have cleared Kavanaugh over the pathetic Avenatti hit job allegations, but decided to keep quiet and let the hysteria get way out of control. This could have made a fundamental difference to the public perception of Kavanaugh, but they let it ride.
Kavanaugh accuser No.2 referred for investigation..
"Today, Chairman @ChuckGrassley referred Judy Munro-Leighton to @TheJusticeDept for investigation for making materially false statements to the Committee during the course of its investigation"
https://twitter.com/senjudiciary/sta...72888406290434
Senate Judiciary Committee Releases Summary of Investigation from Supreme Court Confirmation
414-Page Report Concludes No Evidence to Support Allegations Against Justice Kavanaugh
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pre...t-confirmation
The "Beach friend" is still being investigated..
Statements from two witnesses..
7 Top Takeaways From Grassley’s Report On Brett Kavanaugh’s Accusers
The Senate Judiciary Committee report included several new tidbits that further expose the fraudulent nature of the claims of sexual misconduct against Brett Kavanaugh.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/11/05/...ughs-accusers/
So it seems like they have a pathway to Ford through continuing ingestigation of her Beach Friend. I sincerely hope they get to the bottom of this.
The Federalist is a Conservative website, in case anyone hadn't guessed.
What's that got to do with it? Facts are facts, just read the report for yourself. Then look back at how the liberal media portrayed it. If you want to single out any publications, the shitshow was on the left, not on the right!
Fox News is also a right wing media outlet, in case anyone hadn't guessed.
https://theintercept.com/2018/10/30/...-donald-trump/
Fox News was borne out of Nixon idea for getting the GOP on TV news, apparently. I mean, no-one seeking to hold themselves up as a completely objective, floating-above-the-ignorant-masses, non-partisan type would go near them, would they?
What's that got to do with the FACTS of the Kavanaugh case?And since you have broached the subject, do you have any critical thoughts regarding the left wing media?
When did I broach the subject of left wing media?
Fox News are greatly outnumbered by the Democrat supporting liberal media broadcast organisations, or did that escape your attention? So, Fox News very bad, Democrat supporting news networks very good.
So when did I broach the subject of left wing media?
You randomly brought up the topic of various news organisations supporting specific political parties, and I expanded upon it!
Now just for giggles, I googled Trump & Nixon, and to my surprise all of the liberal media are running stories on the same theme! Is this a coincidence or perhaps something more orchestrated?
BTW, if you haven't had your fill of Trump/Nixon related news I recommend this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...rump-what-next
No, it wasn't random. I brought up the political persuasions of the websites/media you were linking, because they often seem to be linked to the right. Then you took it in a different direction, probably to avoid the question?
Everything in the report was factual. It this your way of trying to discredit facts?
Wrong, and no. I pointed out the right wing media in your posts because you have a habit of laughing down your sleeve whenever someone posts something from the liberal media. The idea that someone from a right wing website (and yourself) might not be wholly objective seems to have passed you by.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
