Quote Originally Posted by Vindec View Post
I was merely reporting the content of the text. A non commercially licensed pilot is able only to claim expenses but all I was implying was that the issue of the pilot not holding a commercial licence is not as significant as it once appeared. In the real World it is questionable whether the pilot did a 3 job for free but the evidence - and that is all a negligence claim is interested in - suggests otherwise.
Of course he didn’t do it for free, and the issues are just as relevant. It is significant. And the more I learn about the pilot, I can understand how he chose to take the job and taking risks. But it does seem a few dodgy ***** are behind it all, dosent it?
Why the police is not gathering documents and computers I do not know.