So Ohr was an intermediary between Steele and Mueller? If this is correct Trump was spot on about the SC being highly conflicted.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...topher-steele/
This snippet of information now makes more sense too..
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
It looks like it's game on. This is not fishing for crimes like what the Dems are doing,they are very specific requests.
So Ohr was an intermediary between Steele and Mueller? If this is correct Trump was spot on about the SC being highly conflicted.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...topher-steele/
This snippet of information now makes more sense too..
Come on lardy, let's be having you my son. Don't go quiet on me, I told you all this stuff wasn't done 'n dusted. They know everything, and so should you as I have previously posted it all on here! There can be no excuses lardy, either you know how to evaluate information or you don't
By the way, the judge and lawyer in the Manafort case stated NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION. They were crimes committed BEFORE he joined the Trump campaign, so good luck with your crazy Trump Russia Collusion theories
Wadda you rekon ?
In the shadows for months and months, in the spotlight now.
Capture.jpg
The judge didn't say that at all.
Trump said that he did and you've just seen his tweet without checking the facts for yourself... Which doesn't doesn't sound like you.
The judge said that Manafort wasn't before the court for anything to do with Russian collusion.
Even sites that you regularly link to are writing about Trump being wrong:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill...e-was-no%3famp
You're having a tough week on here, mate
I'm not sure if we should trust any of them, as I always get the feeling that their instincts are to protect rather than destroy, but let's see. The evidence is clearly mounting, so maybe they will sacrifice a few of their own? BTW the role that Steele played is looking far more significant, and a judge has ordered the public release of his deposition next week.
Don't "exactly" me You were wrong, again.
Everybody knows that Manafort hasn't even been charged with "collusion", so how the f**k was a judge going to prosecute him for it today?
For someone who always tells others to stop falling for things in the media... Maybe it's time you checked whether Trump may be lying to you from time to time
Even Fox News aren't running with the story... Doesn't that seem odd, considering Trump has apparently been vindicated by a judge today?
Trump, Russia, Trump, Russia, Trump
Are you sure you want to do this again... After the mental gymnastics, digging holes for yourself, tying yourself in knots and then burying yourself yesterday? OK then.
You didn't even mention the crimes he was prosecuted for, never mind "clearly state" them. You said "NO COLLUSION". If that's clearly stating his crimes then you might has we'll have said "NO BESTIALITY"... As it would have served the exact same purpose.
What you actually did was reiterate a Trump tweet that he has been called out for in virtually every corner of the media... even on conservative news sites that you use for information. It was such a stupid mistake by Trump, that the Fox News website doesn't have anything on it on their main news stories. It could be somewhere hidden on there, I guess
44 was a fraud.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...ge-was-a-fraud
Heisenberg is in meltdown, lardy is in hiding, and we haven't even got started yet