Reply With QuoteWales Bales is Barnett
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Except when conducting flying operations of course. IOriginally Posted by lardy
clearly remember John Travolta on TV refusing to answer to being in the mile high club as a pilot because he said it would revoke his licence,
Wales Bales is Barnett
It's a two-step process, and you have to confirm it. It's the first time I have used it in 22 years, so I had no prior experience!
Why do people who meet online say "you are not how I expected", when they meet face to face for the first time? As an experiment, go and join Plenty of Fish for a month, and tell me if your perceptions of reality are correct
Haven't you ever dated a model? You make it sound as though it's such a big deal. Are you an ugly bloke, or do you just generally lack confidence? I know a good unqualified football message board psychiatric expert who could give you some advice
Yes it is a 2 step process with one immediately and automatically following the other, asking you to confirm or not, a decision being required before you return to the main message board.
But then I am no computer expert so I'm sure you probably know some way to circumvent that process that would be far too complex for me to follow.
Sounds complicated. Maybe that’s why “Heisenberg” didn’t block me like he said he did.
On the other hand. How sensitive and pussy are you to block someone anyway 😂
Corrected for you. It was he who was doing (or not doing) the blocking!
I clicked ignore and went about my business.
Dont care about Barnett. I was on “Heisenberg”, the meth trainee one ☝️
I will stand toe to toe with anybody on here and debate any topic, but when people focus entirely on presentation and semantics, without adding any original thought, then my opinion of them is already diminished. When they try to present themselves as unqualified football message board psychiatric experts on top of all this, then they can well and truly go and get f*cked. You can't take people like this seriously, so there is no point in giving them the time of day. Personally, I don't want a nutjob following me around on here, so I blocked him.
You take people seriously on here?? Really?
Well, I did remedy it when I saw the offender was still active. We aren't all as smart as you, who manages to get everything right the first time.
We're not taking about banter here mate, sometimes people cross the line. It's the first time I've blocked anybody in 22 years of posting, so maybe that answers your question?
Read what I wrote above about focussing on semantics, I think it's pretty obvious that I don't take myself, or anybody else on here seriously.
Dont know why though. «Heisenberg» is hillarious with his «opinion on all, have no opinion».. His latest training in «mental Health care» will make IT ineteresting thoug 👍
I've nothing to add.
Just here to thank everyone for the entertainment of this thread. Much better than Ireland v France. Superb.
I've enjoyed it myself, talk about going off-topic, it's been a car-crash of a thread since the 5th post!I've nothing to add.
Just here to thank everyone for the entertainment of this thread. Much better than Ireland v France. Superb.
He was actually going to run amok on here until a *real* medical professional called him out, and that is why I confronted him in the first instance. He is totally out of order, and a reminder that people should stick to the topic at hand, rather than trying to make everything personal all the time
This is what not taking the forum seriously looks like, apparently. Absolutely delusional.He was actually going to run amok on here until a *real* medical professional called him out, and that is why I confronted him in the first instance. He is totally out of order, and a reminder that people should stick to the topic at hand, rather than trying to make it personal all of the time
Pot? Kettle?
Yes, but I can't find the evidence in your link that any of those multiple allegations are about current offences. If it's there then why didn't you just point it out to Heisenberg in the first place when he said they were (alleged) historical offences? You wouldn't have had to show your complete ignorance of basic grammar to the whole message board then. Just put up the link about current offences that you said you found easily and that will clear it up.The first two paragraphs of the BBC report clearly stated that multiple allegations have been reported by other media outlets. The alledged 2015 transfer violation was merely one example of these allegations. I thought everybody read the articles that they commented on? BTW It was another poster who started it by posting that these were historical allegations, which turned the thread into an investigation by the resident grammar police into the useage of present and past tenses
Be fair Loramski, he cannot be ignorant of basic grammar, after all he is an A Level english certificate holder. He must be, he said so himself.
Is this an *official* diagnosis in your capacity as resident unqualified football message board psychiatric expert?
PS I accidentally hit the "reveal text" on my phone!
It's the little mistakes that make us betterPot? Kettle?
Posting Permissions