Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
I've not watched much of it, but I'm assuming that the risky decision to include Anderson without him having played a game to prove his fitness has blown up in the selector's faces?

248-9 now which is not a bad outcome when you consider that Australia opted to bat, but all of the momentum is with them now and I have very little faith in this England batting line up.
To be fair Broad has been excellent and Woakes has done well. But 122 for 8 a genuine quick would surely have helped finish it off

If Archer isnt ready Stone should have been in.

Saying that questions must be asked when Andersons calf has gone again after 4 overs.

This female commentator is terrible as well.