+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
You know that you don't have to try to defend RB all of the time, don't you? If he doesn't respond, it's because he knows he's been shown up again for not being as intelligent as he likes to keep telling everyone of the 'fluoride generation'.
He still hasn't responded to the gun control post that he "promised" that he would... because he can't. He answer whether he thought the NHS was evil, like he thinks everything remotely related to socialism inherently is... Because he can't. It's a clear pattern of not being able to back himself up when he gets stuck. You're making yourself look a bit sad by trying to defend him, to be honest.
Also, if posters can't differentiate between an obvious (and witty) joke and a "child like insult" (which simply saying 'Project Fear' wouldn't be anyway, would it?), then that's their problem.
To be frank Heisenberg - and I told you this once- I'm not going to bother trying to discuss stuff with you because you've got a nasty little mouth on you and in any case you can't learn anything from me or anyone else because you think you already know everything.
Yeah, I would have explained the 2nd amendment and my views upon it because at the time I thought you had an intelligent interest in the matter, but then you had one or two outbursts of adolescent abuse and so I'm not going to waste my time - I'm not your special needs teacher or your probation officer .
I'm not sure whether LOM was defending me as such , rather than commenting on the loutish jibbering which some people come out with instead of conversation. In any case , my views and conclusions don't need to be defended against judgement by you because I'm perfectly entitled to hold them whether or not you approve and the purpose of setting them out would be discussion , not to seek vindication or permission from you to disagree .
Another night to sleep on it, yet still no comment - you don't think they've all just missed it do you?
Here's the link again, just in case they did.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCS_FvNXoAERVWs.png
That's a long winded way of saying that you couldn't answer my questions.
You do realise that it was two weeks after those posts that you took offence to something that I said to you, don't you?
Also, you were overly offended by a post that was aimed at you which was ageist, in response to the dozen-or-so posts that you made which were also ageist. This makes you a hypocrite with a complete lack of self-awareness.
It's for reasons like these that you're treated as a joke on here. I enjoy the punchline every time, so please stick around.
Okay, you think what you want
What will they agree too then , I will drop Boris a note .
PLEASE can you spell it out for me as I honesty dont get their position , haven't done for two years now other than trying to get an election ,endless time wasting amendments votes of confidence,unity governments ,what does all that achieve ,they voted for article 50 FFS ??
Both parties know the deal is the deal , as written in the withdrawal agreement ( and repeatedly stated by the EEC )
One thing I'm pretty sure about is that the lack or replies can't be down to them not being able to think of a response proving that all people voting Leave wanted a no deal Brexit because, as they know everything about everything, they must have plenty of them at their fingertips.
This is what people were told when they voted leave.
We won't start article 50 until we have a plan. We'll be able to trade freely with Europe. We'll remain in the free trade zone. We can choose whatever path we want.
I am just re-reading the @michaelgove Brexit speech of April 2016.
— Tom Peck (@tompeck) September 2, 2019
It is simply breathtaking.
If there is a single speech, in all of British political history, that has aged this badly I would love to see it.
It is pure, pure bollocks. pic.twitter.com/ww4rGOa0ZM
No deal was never part of the plan.
Today's developments have made it pretty clear I think. The government are gagging for an election but need to lay groundwork that justifys calling it to brexiteers. Expect a lot of 'the remainers frustrated the negotiations' as we twist and turn our way to a GE that sees us miss the 31st deadline.
The crazy thing is that Johnson's cabal are banking on Corbyn falling into this trap and it shows every sign that he is stupid enough to fall for it.
I wouldn't underestimate how effective the war strategists behind Johnson are. A combination of out Brexiting the Brexit party on the EU and out promising the Labour Party on spending on the very institutions that the people making the promises starved for almost a decade has a good chance of succeeding. They think the opposition is more fractured than they are.
Still, it is a pretty high risk strategy. They could lose Davidson's foothold in Scotland, see weaker NI support, have deselected Tory MPs with a strong personal brand fighting against their replacements and see massive tactical voting, particularly in Tory seats with a strong remain constituency.
It would not surprise that Johnson will be equally as clueless managing any victory as he was after the referendum.
This week may be the culmination of the Siege of Westminster
A defeated force has barricaded itself in at PW for three years , refusing to accept the outcome and trying every last desperate tactic to hang on to power against the will of the people.
Like all sieges it must eventually come to an end, either in a bloody finale or by the besieged faction walking away quietly.
Who knows the outcome ? I really don't think anyone can be certain, but there must now be a battle and an outcome achieved. Napoleon said that the General who merely waits behind his defences , however strong, is already defeated, and this has generally proven true, so we may take something from that.
It will be a great thing if this horrible situation can finally be resolved over the next week, but we cannot be certain.
The difference is that one side can win a final victory, whilst the other can only hope to prolong the stalemate for a bit longer.
Either way, we must move forward at this stage to force a resolution of the siege if not the war.
It's at least 50/50 that the bitter clingers to the EU can be finally overcome this week, and that's a chance which must be taken at this stage, otherwise they'll block all other human activity in the country and sap the substance from the people with their perpetual negative blocking of the vote which was decided three years ago.
If they can rally to halt progress one last time, then at least it's shifted on to the open field and they won't be able to hide any longer behind parliamentary rules which were never intended to frustrate the will of the people or harm the country.