Of the above total of £114m, £40.1m is shown as due to the owner Vincent Tan , some £32.3m of his debt having apparently been repaid during the year. This reduction in debt due to him was replaced by other loans of £39.5m from other (unnamed) parties who are not shareholders or directors (if they were the loans would have had to have been disclosed as related party transactions).
Did he take back 32m and then somebody else lend us 39.5?