Originally Posted by
Toadstool
That was the bit that drew my attention:
"Of the above total of £114m, £40.1m is shown as due to the owner Vincent Tan , some £32.3m of his debt having apparently been repaid during the year. This reduction in debt due to him was replaced by other loans of £39.5m from other (unnamed) parties who are not shareholders or directors"
From the above, I concluded that Tan sold 32.3m of debtto someone for 39.5m - it may just be me but that reads that he's got a chunk of his money back and also a £7m bonus as well.