+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Sen Graham: Mr Rosenstein, given what you know now, would you have signed the FISA warrant?
Mr Rosenstein: No.
Rod is going to spill his guts, he's not taking the rap!
Bad news for McCabe, Strzok, Mueller ...
Zero evidence anybody was colluding with the Russians!!!
Rosie is trying to weasel his way out of this
The Steele dossier was unadulterated BS
Today's showing is just a bunch of doddering ill-informed senators asking soft questions, but they have already blown the self-appointed CCMB Russia collusion experts out of the water.
All countries have individuals spying for a foreign power against their own country for whatever reason (ideological reasons, money, been blackmailed, been threatened etc), that is a given, but you rambling on and on about collusion implies that the state itself or state institutions as a whole are spying for a foreign power, I don't know anyone that things that or I can't say I've seen that on here, many neutral observers think the Russians have influenced and manipulated American elections and as a result foreign policy through good old fashion espionage and the use of social media but I don't think anyone thinks the FBI or the justice department or the CIA or the Senate have been turned on mass.
Do you understand the difference between a rogue individual or individuals and an entire state agency working for a foreign power ?, an individual would be a spy, the whole State or a Government dept would be collusion, preventing individuals from spying is almost impossible, state collusion is very unlikely unless those that run the state want it to happen, like the British State been said to have used Loyalist Paramilitary gangs to bump off people like human rights lawyers that might have been getting people off charges etc.
I assume that the lack of contributions to this thread (apart from one post by Trumpie and a couple from you it has been an exercise in Gluey talking to himself again) is due to boredom at another example of white noise, back covering and general agreement with this from McCabe:
“Mr. Rosenstein’s testimony is completely at odds with the factual record,” he said in a statement. “It looks to be yet another sad attempt by the President and his men to rewrite the history of their actions in 2017. They have found in Mr. Rosenstein — then and now — a willing accessory in that effort.”
I'm not sure about doubling down - as you have imagined or invented most of what you think I have posted on this subject in the past. I did make one post on the substance of the Mueller Investigation a few weeks back, and I have done a few WTF replies to some of your Pavlovian posts that name-check Lardy, Cyril, Russia etc. But otherwise very little.
However, the more I delve the more I am convinced that - technicalities and Mueller feebleness apart - most of the things you love to call hoaxes are basically true. If there was no legal-standard proof of collusion with Russia by the Trump election team, there was at least significant contact and exchange of information. The Russians interfered on Trump's side in the election. Then when he got the presidency there was obstruction of justice, threats, bribes, lies by the bucketful, intimidation, abuse of office and presidential power and the charge sheet just keeps growing. Against all of those charges the verdict is GUILTY!
When it comes to this latest twist or turn I agree with the Democrats (they sometimes get it right):
Wednesday’s hearing was largely a relitigation of the events surrounding the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation that ensnared Trump and his allies for years — a rerun that Republicans said was necessary for accountability, and one that Democrats asserted was a waste of the committee’s time amid a global pandemic, economic depression, and nation protests against police brutality.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...a-probe-298253
Trump is not the victim!
@Wales-Bales I got your message the other day but I can't reply as you have no room left.