Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Made me chuckle that you don't want to get between the guy you have been slavishly following, copy and pasting and quoting for over three years and me. You do wonder what is the point of pretending to have perception and insight not available to mere mortals if all you are going to do is stand back and watch with no added value.
Anyway the fully joined up jigsaw puzzle is a massive leap of faith with more holes than a collendar.
The basic premise is that the Senate Intelligence Committee was in cahoots with an employee Wolfe, to leak the FISA application on Carter Page to the press. When a diligent FBI agent caught Wolfe he concluded that the FISA application was part of it. His file and materials was sent to the Mueller investigation. When the Mueller team realised the FISA "leak" came from the Senate they covered it up, removed evidence and deliberately saw that Wolfe was only charged with the lesser offence of leaking non-classified material.
The first thing you ask yourself is so what. I am struggling to understand where this sits in the they are all after Trump narrative. Perhaps you can set out even if the tenuous conclusions on the chain of events is correct then what does it prove?
Then there are the palpable holes in the plot. The Democrat Vice Chair of the Committee initiated the leak investigation which is glossed over. Why do that if you wanted the document to get into the public domain?
The article says that "Six weeks later, July 21, 2018, the DOJ mysteriously declassified and publicly released the Carter Page FISA application." as if this was part of the plot. It didn't stop Trump tweeting gleefully on that very day. I guess he is in on it too.
The supposition that there is only one specific version of the FISA application, that without a shred of proof suggesting that Mueller suppressed evidence and that this was an almighty cover up of monstrous proportions. No wonder his right wing competitors are falling over themselves suggesting that the guy's ego has got ahead of any credible narrative.
As I said before someone thinks it a good idea to put this narcissist in front of one of the Durham investigators for a couple of hours. They don't want conspiracy fires burning out, quite the opposite. If Durham fails to hit the heights of Trump expectation then it may be more convenient to blame the investigators rather than the facts.
Still you stay in your little comfort bubble cutting and pasting as if you are one of the in-crowd.