Originally Posted by
JamesWales
Of course you should look at good and bad. And it's fair to criticise the ambitions of funding levels, but just focusing on speculation around one funding bid and ignoring all others is pretty pathetic.
There are always more controversial recipients of funding, it doesn't undermine the whole process. You guys are just as bad as people on the opposite end of the spectrum who do exactly the same thing, pick one example of controversial funding and rubbish everything about it
Two cheeks of the same arse!