Originally Posted by
dml1954
She regularly gets tongue tied and doesn't have the vocabulary to sort it out. She knows little about the mens game and quite a bit of what she says therefore doesn't make much sense. If the criteria for selecting a suitable presenter, commentator or summariser for a game was they they looked good then she would win hands down but shouldn't it be more to do with their football knowledge and communication skills ? Women are now dominating football punditry on BBC and ITV, presumably because these channels rarely are able to show live mens football and are trying to make themselves look more relevant. The standard of presenting has therefore dropped quite considerably as a result. Eni Aluko, Karen Carney and Alex Scott are the worst of a bad bunch and come across as almost illiterate with some of the things they say. Just because someone was a good footballer doesn't make them a good presenter.