+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Look it's going to be a busy day what with the production of the perfectly formed case study and the proof to support your assertion that covid was lab manufactured.
Smiley man II can provide the goods on the 1:550000 stat.
You need to move on from endless meaningless cliches and platitudes. You can do it. I mean it looks like you have ditched Donald and jumped ship already!
Just looking at the data presented which doesn’t differentiate from overweight and obese. It’s woth reiterating (again) 2020 data was before vaccination rollout
Clearly Covid was minimal risk to healthy people which is the whole justification of the original thread.
With regards to 2/3rds of adults being overweight and obese why were fitness establishments closed and fast food joints open ?
Where was the drive to fitness and well-being and healthy eating ? Instead they locked these people away.
Just stating facts.
It’s not as high as 550,000 as the data was not for a calendar year, as pointed out by Cyril , that said deaths involved “just Covid” is very low considering the measures undertaken and excess deaths not involving Covid will far outweigh the lives saved during lockdown
Excess deaths continue to rise - In the past 28 weeks we have had 15,195 more deaths than we would expect for the time of year if the chance of dying was the same as pre-pandemic.
https://twitter.com/statsjamie/statu...3fpwSaYgoYdmZg
This link may be of better use
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulat...eviousReleases
So apart from the timeframe, the use of the wrong comparative populations, the failure to factor in the impact of preventative measures and the erroneous comparison with deaths by dog mauling we clearly don't understand data.
Still you got a big smiley from your chum so its all been worth it I suppose!
I misread the data as I was on a cell phone , furthermore, even when the data is corrected , it’s still extremely low risk, and if you manipulate the dog death data , you’re still more at risk from a dog attack, which must be horrific.
Now, I appreciate you probably in the higher risk group, but I’m not and neither are millions of others.
If anything like this happens again, I doubt they will do the same, however
no doubt, there will be selfish people, ( in my opinion ) who advocate it.
What’s you view on the links posted from Twitter , (excess deaths)I think it’s extremely worrying ?
Reading through that twitter thread, it looks like the author is blaming the state of the healthcare service for the increase.
What I like about the pandemic diaries they are actual facts and give us much need insight
Royalties from this book are going to NHS charities, which I suppose is a gesture.’
Wonder how many of us would have done a better job and had a secret snog in the office ??
I think the man was used as useful patsy , and folks love to have a go at those in society who have an nasty view of unappealing personalities like him .
It's like you can't stop digging. According to this two people were killed by dogs in the whole of 2020. Talk us through how you got to the relative risk calculation?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...United_Kingdom
On the excess deaths, as Lardy points out these are likely to be the same people with underlying conditions who you would have happily quarantined. The same people who would have found it far more difficult to access planned or acute medical treatment if more and more "healthy" people began clogging up the health system because for every dead "healthy" person there would be x times more requiring hospital treatment before recovering.
Well done you for buying it and digesting it so quickly. Which actual facts were you most impressed by?
Great to see that you share the same views on royalties as Katherine Forster of GB News.
'His royalties from this book are going to NHS charities, which I suppose is a gesture.' GB News Political Reporter, Katherine Forster, .
Not sure on the secret snog point. Perhaps the more circumspect would have looked for security cameras first.
If I understand your last point. There are folk who like nothing more than calling out those who dislike unappealing people. I hold my hand up to disliking unappealing people so where do you stand on the people who call me out because of it?
Wikipedia, that’s fully paid up by the narrative pushers my friend. Excess deaths appear to be in the non risk groups.
Have a listen to this
https://twitter.com/talktv/status/15...UorTUVk0j640Dg
Please the dog comparison has to stop.🤣🤣🤣
Perhaps if you weren't too busy ridiculing people for failing to understand data and statistics whilst clearly doing so yourself you may have had a more sensible discussion.
Anyway. On the subject of statistics there is an excellent weekly synopsis of excess deaths here. It tracks the path from the outbreak of covid to the present.
https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrI...Y2NiIsImMiOjh9
You can use the drop down features to analyse by age, region, type of disease etc. Could come in really handy next time you want to make a point.
Here's someone else who has read the Hancock stocking-filler from cover to cover:
https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...arvellous-i-am
It's a better review!
Digested read, digested: The Secret Diary of Door Matt Hancock, Aged 42¾