Reply With QuoteTrouble is he’s not going to win anything again, moved to win a league title. Shame.
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
33 goals in 33 appearances
You can't complain about that
Trouble is he’s not going to win anything again, moved to win a league title. Shame.
He's crying all the way to the bankOriginally Posted by Cleve van Leef
Sometimes money becomes secondary
Following what looks to have been a fruitless transfer to Bayern, I've had it on good authority that Harry Kane has submitted a request to join TNS next season.
He signed a four year contract with Bayern, even if they don’t win anything this season, pretty sure they’ll pick a few trophies up in that time he’s there in the next three.
Way more of a chance than spurs would ever have.
It maybe an odd thing, but Spurs seem better without him than with him. I mentioned some time ago that they relied on him too much.
Now I read a few days ago that although Kane has scored an amazing number of goals this season, Munich as a team have scored less than before, which is part of the reason for their relatively dismal season.
Is there something about him that really does cause negativity in a team?
Certainly nothing in his personality that would indicate he has a negative impact on the team.
More likely that the team's tactics have changed to incorporate him. Maybe having a new manager this season has had a bigger impact than that of signing of Kane.
Surprised you would see money as the be-all and end-all of everything.
I am sure Harry would like to see some silverware in his mitts rather than watching it on the TV like the rest of us.
Better in what respect?
No.
As funny as it is to see Kane not win anything again, I don't think he can be held responsible. He's top scorer by 10 goals, Bayern's goals against is the worst in the top 4. Even then, it's taken an historic unbeaten (so far) season to get ahead of them.
I'm not sure, which is why I asked. You might reasonably expect a team as prolific as Bayern to improve when he joins it, even allowing for a new manager. This season, Spurs seamed more of a 'team' that when he was there,even though they fell at the last hurdle.
I wonder if other players rely on him too much and maybe mentally back off when he is there, but unconsciously up their game when he's not.
A bit like a team down to 10 men can often be harder to beat.
He'll win the league there next year.
I'd still have him ahead of Haaland currently.
Their improvement this season has been down to a change of manager and, as a result, change of approach to attacking football rather than the loss of Kane. Kane would have had a field day this season playing in a Postecoglu side.
Maybe!!
When you look back at your illustrious career most world class players will have won something though, they are all minted anyway.
They are a more rounded team .
I went to a Spurs game when they played Liverpool at home last season , Kane was outstanding in a very poor team . Watching them now they are more of a team .
would seem you can complain about it
Not sure many Man City fans would swap Haaland for Kane.
I just think he scores the same as Haaland in that team, but offers more with his all round game. Look how many he's score at Bayern, and I' going to guess they don't create as much as City.
Posting Permissions
