+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I asked a question which nobody has answered. BTW do you have any proof that Clinton is not involved? I mean if they colluded to quash the investigation, wouldn't it need her participation? What about the tarmac meeting? Without Hillary's actions regarding the server, there would have been no need for an investigation in the first place, so I'm not sure why you want to leave her out of the discussion.
This is all a tad strange. You start a thread pronouncing that twitter is ablaze with the possible referral of Hillary Clinton for criminal prosecution without any seeming substance to support this followed by a reference to officials potentially under scrutiny in the OIG report. This morphed into a challenge to prove that she is not implicated. A bit like me saying that I heard rumours that Donald Trump fathered a number of illegitimate children and paid people off to cover this up. Prove that he didn't please?
I don't want to leave her out of the discussion as you state, quite the opposite as the thread was about her culpability. I was keen to understand the evidence you had to support bringing her into the conversation in the first place.