AAIB INTERIM REPORT

[Sky High Bluebird]

RTFM What part of "As long as I put in my 1,920 hours per annum either in the office or the air " didn't you understand?

40hrs per week = 1920hrs over 48weeks
The 40hr week can be made up of office hours or flying hours or sitting on my rear waiting for whatever

And i asked the question what FTL scheme if any do,you operate to ?.

Also what register is the PA46 you allege to operate on ? and under what category ?
Private or Public transport ?
Curious also to know what licence you hold ?

[Flyer46]

And i asked the question what FTL scheme if any do,you operate to ?.

Also what register is the PA46 you allege to operate on ? and under what category ?
Private or Public transport ?
Curious also to know what licence you hold ?

We operate our PA46 in full compliance to CAP1267 & 1268 with special attention to FTL 205(a)
We operate our PA46 in the Public Transport category
I operate our PA46 on a CPL/IR

Now, I have answered your questions, I am equally curious to know what licence you hold & what your day to day hack is ?

[Sky High Bluebird]

We operate our PA46 in full compliance to CAP1267 & 1268 with special attention to FTL 205(a)
We operate our PA46 in the Public Transport category
I operate our PA46 on a CPL/IR

Now, I have answered your questions, I am equally curious to know what licence you hold & what your day to day hack is ?

That’s interesting is it the turbine model ? And I take it you fly it single crew ?

EASA ATPL HOLDER , Current Airbus A320 Captain FYI

[Flyer46]

That’s interesting is it the turbine model ? And I take it you fly it single crew ?

EASA ATPL HOLDER , Current Airbus A320 Captain FYI

Currently 500TP & it is sometimes single crew & sometimes multi crew.
Possibly looking to upgrade to the M600 or PC12NG in a year or so.

Not quite in the Airbus league, so hats are doffed to you

[Sky High Bluebird]

We operate our PA46 in full compliance to CAP1267 & 1268 with special attention to FTL 205(a)
We operate our PA46 in the Public Transport category
I operate our PA46 on a CPL/IR

Now, I have answered your questions, I am equally curious to know what licence you hold & what your day to day hack is ?

Without wanting to nitpick but CAP 1267 & 1268 are just CAA publications which refer to the introduction of EASA ORO.FTL.100 legislation from Feb 2016.

If as say you do you fly this aircraft single crew or multi crew on an AOC where the largest aircraft has less than 19 seats then I seem to remember you are exempt from this legislation.

You may want to tell your boss

Also FTL 205(a) doesn’t apply to single crew ops , as you are still under UK CAA CAP 371 rules.

[Flyer46]

Without wanting to nitpick but CAP 1267 & 1268 are just CAA publications which refer to the introduction of EASA ORO.FTL.100 legislation from Feb 2016.

If as say you do you fly this aircraft single crew or multi crew on an AOC where the largest aircraft has less than 19 seats then I seem to remember you are exempt from this legislation.

You may want to tell your boss

Also FTL 205(a) doesn’t apply to single crew ops , as you are still under UK CAA CAP 371 rules.

Complying to something that isn't mandatory is a safety net we use, so whilst I don't see your message as nitpicking I don't feel it is productive for me/us to continue discussing aviation procedures or protocol because the footie fans are getting a tad peeved by incessant posting of aviation stuff because it falls into non footie stuff as far as they are concerned.

[Baloo]

Complying to something that isn't mandatory is a safety net we use, so whilst I don't see your message as nitpicking I don't feel it is productive for me/us to continue discussing aviation procedures or protocol because the footie fans are getting a tad peeved by incessant posting of aviation stuff because it falls into non footie stuff as far as they are concerned.

I've never noticed anybody getting peeved by SHB's posts on here tbh.

[Des Parrot]

Complying to something that isn't mandatory is a safety net we use, so whilst I don't see your message as nitpicking I don't feel it is productive for me/us to continue discussing aviation procedures or protocol because the footie fans are getting a tad peeved by incessant posting of aviation stuff because it falls into non footie stuff as far as they are concerned.

No do please carry on. Sky High Bluebird has been providing our aviation feedback on both of the recent tragedies relating to football & aviation. He's certainly not late to the party and has commented on the Sala tragedy from the first day.

Speaking on behalf of footie fans any diversion from the last couple of performances is welcome.

Fill your boots.

[Sky High Bluebird]

Complying to something that isn't mandatory is a safety net we use, so whilst I don't see your message as nitpicking I don't feel it is productive for me/us to continue discussing aviation procedures or protocol because the footie fans are getting a tad peeved by incessant posting of aviation stuff because it falls into non footie stuff as far as they are concerned.

I find that hard to believe given the ridiculous costs involved.

I think given your “knowledge” on all things aviation it’s best you stick to football .......

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Complying to something that isn't mandatory is a safety net we use, so whilst I don't see your message as nitpicking I don't feel it is productive for me/us to continue discussing aviation procedures or protocol because the footie fans are getting a tad peeved by incessant posting of aviation stuff because it falls into non footie stuff as far as they are concerned.

The hole is getting bigger and bigger, post by post. You came on here disparaging others with less intelligence than you and with an inferior education to you - and then tried to dismiss someone, a regular on here with considerable gravitas, before learning than he who knows more about aviation than you do.

[Flyer46]

The hole is getting bigger and bigger, post by post. You came on here disparaging others with less intelligence than you and with an inferior education to you - and then tried to dismiss someone, a regular on here with considerable gravitas, before learning than he who knows more about aviation than you do.

Did I not say to SHB " I doff my hat to you? "

The trouble with having posters with 'monikers' is you just don't know who you are actually chatting to?

There are probably quite a lot of regulars on here with considerable gravitas, you really don't know who or what the next person is?

For all you know one of the 'monikers' could be John Hartson or even Neil Warnock so I have learnt today that it is wiser to see the cut of the person before 'cutting them down'

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Did I not say to SHB " I doff my hat to you? "

Prior to your comment above you replied to SHB as follows: "I find people like Wales-Bales more interesting than you ( but then I would seeing as I am allegedly him )"

Well, guess what, SHB's posts have always been interesting (and still are) but you tried your patronising attitude yet again and came very much unstuck! Only afterwards did you adjust your position. Fool yourself by all means.

[Michael Morris]

Did I not say to SHB " I doff my hat to you? "

The trouble with having posters with 'monikers' is you just don't know who you are actually chatting to?

There are probably quite a lot of regulars on here with considerable gravitas, you really don't know who or what the next person is?

For all you know one of the 'monikers' could be John Hartson or even Neil Warnock so I have learnt today that it is wiser to see the cut of the person before 'cutting them down'

I've stayed out of this and let you all get on with it but am I right in thinking that you are slamming people who use 'monikers' when you use a 'moniker' yourself.

Seems a lot of your credibility has been lost, and it's everyone else's fault