Daily Mail surpasses itself.

[delmbox]

what is wrong with it? who says we should only judge a person based on their deeds or actions? its hardly sexist to make a comment about women's legs. at what point is the article suggesting women are somehow inferior to men and therefore deserve to be treated differently?

BTW I think you will find women are very critical of other women, more so than men are. If women don't have the right accoutrements, women can really be bitchy about it...

What's wrong with it is that a meeting between the two most powerful women in the UK about the most important issue in a generation is framed on the front page of the biggest selling newspaper in the country as a competition about who has the best legs. It's pathetic, sexist and quite frankly embarrassing

[A Quiet Monkfish]

What's wrong with it is that a meeting between the two most powerful women in the UK about the most important issue in a generation is framed on the front page of the biggest selling newspaper in the country as a competition about who has the best legs. It's pathetic, sexist and quite frankly embarrassing

You are a bloke, aren't you.. [?]

[delmbox]

You are a bloke, aren't you.. [?]

I am, however I also consider women to be people*



copyright George R Martin*

[Barry Shitpeas]

What's wrong with it is that a meeting between the two most powerful women in the UK about the most important issue in a generation is framed on the front page of the biggest selling newspaper in the country as a competition about who has the best legs. It's pathetic, sexist and quite frankly embarrassing

I agree with this. The Mail deserve a panning for it, it's 2017 ferchrissakes.