| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Regarding this matter I specifically called out the faked yearbook, and the witnesses who disputed the accusers version of events, which seem to be an accurate observations on my part.Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
This now also raises a doubt about the lawyer who is running all of these cases.
That wasn't the question I asked. As per previous posts there are an array of women giving a pattern of evidence against Moore. Do you believe that at a point in his life at least he had at best an unhealthy interest in young and underage women or is it all a plot by Democrats and agenda lawyers to unfairly discredit him. You must have a view given the material you have previously posted.
Like I said, there are some doubts about the lawyer who is running all of these cases, now that it has been admitted she was using fake evidence to back up her claims. Let's she how her testimony stands up before Congress.
I underestimated the difficulty of shifting your arse off a fence. I'll leave it there!
Gloria Allred was a red flag long before Moore decided to run for the senate, so when she shows up with multiple cases a few weeks before an election, you already know that you have to question everything. The yearbook was the first domino to officially fall, so let's see what else congress can prise out of her. I'm not claiming anybody's guilt or innocence, just pointing out that these accusations have been denied, and some of the evidence is already starting to look a bit flakey, which is not what you want when trying to prove credibility.
Maybe lardy will chip in, he seems to know things that I don't.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote