City in court again

[Kris]

If there are outstanding matters and MM is implicated, then Vincent Tan should have just raised it when it came to light. Not now.
In fact there ought to be a counter case of 'withholding knowledge of a crime (with malicious intent)'.

If they should have been punished for a wrongdoing, then that should have been long underway.

Now it looks vindictive and petty - whether MM / IM still have a case to answer or not.

It seems that MM and Iain M are getting their careers back together.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that Moody was on his backside and living back with his parents for a while? Cannot verify.

FFS. Apparently a very poor way to go about things here, Vincent Tan.

Do you really think it is that easy to get a case heard in the High Court in 1 day? The case is being heard tomorrow FFS. This is merely a coincidence that it clashes with a new job for the racist.

Tan probably raised this case months ago, and its only now making the media.

[Vimana.]

Do you really think it is that easy to get a case heard in the High Court in 1 day? The case is being heard tomorrow FFS. This is merely a coincidence that it clashes with a new job for the racist.

Tan probably raised this case months ago, and its only now making the media.

The article uses the phrase 'Cardiff have launched a claim'.
That would suggest that it is a fairly fresh event, but yeah, a one day turnaround does seem incredulous.

It is the Daily Mail. It is also quite feasibly just desperate bollocks or full of made-up bits.
I shouldn't rise to it.

[lardy]

The article uses the phrase 'Cardiff have launched a claim'.
That would suggest that it is a fairly fresh event, but yeah, a one day turnaround does seem incredulous.

It is the Daily Mail. It is also quite feasibly just desperate bollocks or full of made-up bits.
I shouldn't rise to it.

Sorry to go all Bluetit, but I think you mean incredible, not incredulous. :

[BLUETIT]

Sorry to go all Bluetit, but I think you mean incredible, not incredulous. :

Eye ham hear ewe no

[Vimana.]

Sorry to go all Bluetit, but I think you mean incredible, not incredulous. :

I might have used it wrongly?, but I did mean incredulous - as in 'incredulous to me'.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incredulous


TBH, an incorrect (or not) word is the least of my own woes in this thread, having a: taken the Daily Mail seriously and b: got slightly jerky of knee over it ;) deary me, what was I (not) thinking!

[lardy]

I might have used it wrongly?, but I did mean incredulous - as in 'incredulous to me'.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incredulous


TBH, an incorrect (or not) word is the least of my own woes in this thread, having a: taken the Daily Mail seriously and b: got slightly jerky of knee over it ;) deary me, what was I (not) thinking!

I see the problem here, you're using a dictionary for yanks

[BLUEAWAY]

They have launched a claim to have it heard in open court....not launched a claim