so Spillers bans Morrissey

[JDerrida]

And their view is that his records shouldn't be sold in their shop. Simple

So the Christian bakers should have been allowed to say no to being forced to sell gay iconography on their cakes, because the gay customers deliberately targeted their shop.

[City123]

So the Christian bakers should have been allowed to say no to being forced to sell gay iconography on their cakes, because the gay customers deliberately targeted their shop.

No, refusing to sell something to someone based on who they happen to love is infringes on their rights and discriminates sue to something they can't control

This is a slightly different case seeing as you can't choose to be gay or straight, whereas Morrissey can choose to support far-right candidates

[xsnaggle]

No, refusing to sell something to someone based on who they happen to love is infringes on their rights and discriminates sue to something they can't control

This is a slightly different case seeing as you can't choose to be gay or straight, whereas Morrissey can choose to support far-right candidates

A lot of people may disagree with that statement. some see young gays now as just "doing the Gay thing" because it's fashionable

[NYCBlue]

So the Christian bakers should have been allowed to say no to being forced to sell gay iconography on their cakes, because the gay customers deliberately targeted their shop.

There was no "gay iconography". It was just a cake for a gay couple. Also, being gay is not a political standpoint. Assuming you're not gay, did you choose to be heterosexual?

[Hungry Blue]

There was no "gay iconography". It was just a cake for a gay couple.

Yes there was, they wanted 'support gay marriage" on it which was the whole basis of the objection, not that they would not sell to a gay couple.

Is Spillers still selling Michael Jackson records?