Convicted murderers

[xsnaggle]

If he has always declared his innocence (I don't know in this case) how can a convicted man tell anyone where the body of someone he didn't kill is?

[MacAdder]

Good cases for both sides ^^

If there is no doubt whatsoever of the convicted person being the murderer, then no definitely not.

[xsnaggle]

Good cases for both sides ^^

If there is no doubt whatsoever of the convicted person being the murderer, then no definitely not.

Oh Well if there's no doubt then why not hang them? If there is no doubt then there will not be any miscarriages of justice. Sorted!!!

[Harry Monk]

Good cases for both sides ^^

If there is no doubt whatsoever of the convicted person being the murderer, then no definitely not.

Do you mean if they're convicted by a jury beyond all reasonable doubt?

[The Lone Gunman]

If he has always declared his innocence (I don't know in this case) how can a convicted man tell anyone where the body of someone he didn't kill is?

In this particular case, the individual concerned has always declared his innocence despite overwhelming forensic evidence that he was indeed the murderer.

Incredibly, his defence during his trial in 1989 was that a person unknown must have got into his flat, stolen his clothes, dressed in them, attacked and murdered the victim without his knowledge, then used his car to dispose of her body and left his clothes where they would be found to incriminate him.

This guy shouldn't be released. He should be shot.