The Donald Trump thread

[Sgt. Pepper]

There you go again, I have already said I haven't found any conclusive evidence one way or the other, and I haven't declared an outcome in this matter.

You surely must have found something regards this pedo story, otherwise you wouldn't refer to it regularly.

Lardy was asked, apparently in a typically haughty way, earlier whether he had ever looked outside the MSM on the subject

Now you say that you have nothing conclusive on it either..

Do you diners of the hallowed flesh ever get to illustrate the conclusion to any af your alt theories?!

A neutral observer would be bound to ask- Is it all nods, winks, dodgy websites and the perennial '..any time now..
?

[Wales-Bales]

You surely must have found something regards this pedo story, otherwise you wouldn't refer to it regularly.

Lardy was asked, apparently in a typically haughty way, earlier whether he had ever looked outside the MSM on the subject

Now you say that you have nothing conclusive on it either..

Do you diners of the hallowed flesh ever get to illustrate the conclusion to any af your alt theories?!

A neutral observer would be bound to ask- Is it all nods, winks, dodgy websites and the perennial '..any time now..
?

Conclusive evidence = prosecutions or the published findings from an official public enquiry. Neither have happened, so in the meantime all outcomes are inconclusive in my opinion. I'm not sure how lardy got to his cast iron version of events though, he's a better man than me

[lardy]

Conclusive evidence = prosecutions or the published findings from an official public enquiry. Neither have happened, so in the meantime all outcomes are inconclusive in my opinion. I'm not sure how lardy got to his cast iron version of events though, he's a better man than me

Don't write cheques you can't cash then, particularly about one of the most gruesome acts imaginable. Your neighbour probably hasn't been cleared of paedophiliac acts in court but do you spread rumours until he has? Because all outcomes there are inconclusive.

It's not a question of me knowing the cast iron version of events, it's about basic human decency.

[Wales-Bales]

Don't write cheques you can't cash then, particularly about one of the most gruesome acts imaginable. Your neighbour probably hasn't been cleared of paedophiliac acts in court but do you spread rumours until he has? Because all outcomes there are inconclusive.

It's not a question of me knowing the cast iron version of events, it's about basic human decency.

I'm not spreading any rumours. These suspicions came to light through the own words of the people involved. Has it been investigated? FOIA requests haven't come up with any evidence of an investigation. If it were me I would be eager to clear my name through a proper investigation or a public enquiry. Regarding my neighbour, what's he got to do with it? Or are you doing your little strawman arguement thing again?

[lardy]

I'm not spreading any rumours. These suspicions came to light through the own words of the people involved. Has it been investigated? FOIA requests haven't come up with any evidence of an investigation. If it were me I would be eager to clear my name through a proper investigation or a public enquiry. Regarding my neighbour, what's he got to do with it? Or are you doing your little strawman arguement thing again?

Have they investigated whether a paedophile ring was running from the basement of a pizzeria that has no basement? Let me check.

[Wales-Bales]

Have they investigated whether a paedophile ring was running from the basement of a pizzeria that has no basement? Let me check.

That's how the media specifically framed it, Hillary being in the basement of a pizza shop abusing kids. Did those 4 things happen at the same time? Was Hillary in the basement of a pizza restaurant with children? Of course not, it's all semantics, but somehow this is proof that the whole story has been debunked. And what about the perverted Instagram photos with the sick comments? Not one media person brought these imagages up when they interviewed the restaurant owner. What kind of journalism is that? If these people want to put this story to bed, then they need to address these issues. Until then there is going to be an element of doubt in some people's minds.

BTW the basement is in the other restaurant that he runs two doors away.

[Packerman]

You surely must have found something regards this pedo story, otherwise you wouldn't refer to it regularly.

Lardy was asked, apparently in a typically haughty way, earlier whether he had ever looked outside the MSM on the subject

Now you say that you have nothing conclusive on it either..

Do you diners of the hallowed flesh ever get to illustrate the conclusion to any af your alt theories?!

A neutral observer would be bound to ask- Is it all nods, winks, dodgy websites and the perennial '..any time now..
?

nailed it, gluey can pontificate for months. the thread could end on that line

[Wales-Bales]

nailed it, gluey can pontificate for months. the thread could end on that line

I will make one prediction especially for you. Trump is going to go down as either the greatest President in US history, or the worst. He will not occupy any other position.

[Sgt. Pepper]

I will make one prediction especially for you. Trump is going to go down as either the greatest President in US history, or the worst. He will not occupy any other position.

Wont he just use the adjective 'greatest' either way, whatever happens? ;)

He's not looking too great tonight. Again.

Here is President Greatest making America Great - again.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40952820

^^ Fake News, Fake News, Fake News.

[Wales-Bales]

Bloody Murdoch / Fox meddling in global politics?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40940931

Bannon is not my kind of guy, but he is a man with brains and a particular vision and Trump certainly owes him a lot of gratitude.

But WTF is Murdock doing telling a President what to do ?

"The anti-Bannon contingent includes Rupert Murdoch, the Fox News founder who's repeatedly lobbied the president, according to the New York Times, for the strategist to be sacked."

^^ NYTimes via BBC - Fake News, Fake News.

I love the BBC they are the best at what they do. They even sent their former Director-General over to the New York Times as CEO to show them how to do what they do.

[Mrs Steve R]

I love the BBC they are the best at what they do. They even sent their former Director-General over to the New York Times as CEO to show them how to do what they do.

Yes, lying.

[Sgt. Pepper]

While I often 'distrust' the veracity of BBC news, to be clear here - ^^ are you both stating that the contents of that BBC article is a lie, based on a NY Times lie?

So, Bannon is not teetering on the edge of favour, and Murdoch is not seeking to influence the Presidents agenda?

[Sgt. Pepper]

I love the BBC they are the best at what they do. They even sent their former Director-General over to the New York Times as CEO to show them how to do what they do.

My word! - is that true? Where did you read that?

[lardy]

I will make one prediction especially for you. Trump is going to go down as either the greatest President in US history, or the worst. He will not occupy any other position.

So what do we reckon? Any takers for 'greatest'?

[cyril evans awaydays]

So what do we reckon? Any takers for 'greatest'?

I'm on the fence regarding the greatest. Was going to say Lincoln but I heard that there is something about to drop in two weeks time that will show him to be the most corrupt politician everer

[cyril evans awaydays]

https://twitter.com/_thegingerjesus/...989893/photo/1