Daily Mail at it again - Sir Edward Heath

[Wales-Bales]

So, moving forward with this news item, I would like to introduce an additional news category that is beyond Fake News. I think we should call it WTF! News.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-sex-cult.html

[Vimana.]

So, moving forward with this news item, I would like to introduce an additional news category that is beyond Fake News. I think we should call it WTF! News.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-sex-cult.html

Crikey.

The Mail, supposed darlings of the Tory party? .. what can be going on here?!

It's shocking stuff. Where will it lead?

If this comes to nothing, then there would be very little appetite for pursuing any further revelations involving politicians (etc) thereafter would there?
People in the comments sections have already been asking why 'time and money is being wasted on historical abuse'. As if it doesn't even matter.

It will be interesting to see if this is really about truth/justice, or about assembling a cloak to protect against further potential claims of systemic abuse in high places, or the Mail going even further with some agenda, having recently found such a profound ability to manipulate the British Government.

These alleged events have been hinted about for years though.

[David Vincent]

Crikey.

The Mail, supposed darlings of the Tory party? .. what can be going on here?!

It's shocking stuff. Where will it lead?

If this comes to nothing, then there would be very little appetite for pursuing any further revelations involving politicians (etc) thereafter would there?
People in the comments sections have already been asking why 'time and money is being wasted on historical abuse'. As if it doesn't even matter.

It will be interesting to see if this is really about truth/justice, or about assembling a cloak to protect against further potential claims of systemic abuse in high places, or the Mail going even further with some agenda, having recently found such a profound ability to manipulate the British Government.

These alleged events have been hinted about for years though.

Why would an attempt to expose Heath be "a cloak to protect against further potential claims of systemic about in high places"? The story is just a load of nonsense which might sell a few more newspapers and might put a few bob in the pockets of some liars and fantasists.

There is far more fake news in The Guardian, The Times and The Telegraph than in The Mail. At least The Mail has at least one journalist - Peter Hitchens - who is capable of independent thought. Some of the "journalists" on The Times and The Telegraph are just mouthpieces for government propaganda. There was a typical anti-Putin piece in The Times today. Peter Hitchens, however, regularly warns about all this anti-Russian propaganda. I would guess that these "journalists" pushing anti-Russian stories are being paid by governments, globalists and by their newspapers.

Most people are quite willing to lie for money. If that means blackening someone's name they don't care. In the case of Savile or Rolf Harris these liars probably think everyone knows they are bad people so a few extra lies won't make any difference.

[Vimana.]

Why would an attempt to expose Heath be "a cloak to protect against further potential claims of systemic about in high places"? The story is just a load of nonsense which might sell a few more newspapers and might put a few bob in the pockets of some liars and fantasists.


..

.

I thought I'd been clear there with the notion: "If this comes to nothing, then there would be very little appetite for pursuing any further revelations involving politicians (etc) thereafter would there?"

i.e. there are so many incredulous stories flying about in our lives these days that - should some genuinely ludicrous event be uncovered - then it may likely just appear to be just another crazy, crazy story dreamt up by crazies.
Not just upon this subject. Every-bloody-where.

If this whopper of an 'on-high paedophilia' story is shown to be apparent bollocks (whether is it or isn't) and gets dashed upon the rocks - with many left reeling - then who will believe the next mind-blowing case? And who would dare run with it? Would the public even care by then?

As for your (or your MB persona's) notion that Savile was likely 'a bit hard done by', and your stated belief that "most" people will lie for money. ... Good grief...