Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
This is the last time I'll respond as it has become a complete farce.
You said in a post further up that you never made any presumptions (not "assertions" - talk about moving goalposts, eh?) about the story and never mentioned who may have travelled alone etc.
As well as the post where you said that you have interpreted the article as the wife and child already being in Durham and Cummings driving up to meet them... In another post you responded by saying:
"When I read that he rushed home I assumed she meant Durham, the have a home there but i still cannot find a reference to London"
That's another assumption and a statement of fact to follow it. You literally said "I assumed" in the text.
Are you still going to deny that you made a lot of assumptions and stated some facts based on that article, even though it's there in black and white?
I assume that you will reply with another convoluted response, but have at it.
Reply With Quote