Sell on clauses

[Heisenberg]

I can imagine that not all contracts are absolutely identical and that they may vary in their complexity.

Again, yes... but it's not a contractual issue, it's a football governing issue on transfers and how they are enforced.

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Again, yes... but it's not a contractual issue, it's a football governing issue on transfers and how they are enforced.

It seems that it is more nuanced than that e.g. gross v net fee:

https://www.ecaeurope.com/media/2728...tin-5-2015.pdf

[Heisenberg]

It seems that it is more nuanced than that e.g. gross v net fee:

https://www.ecaeurope.com/media/2728...tin-5-2015.pdf

I'm well aware of that, but we're not discussing all of the semantics of a sell on fee - we're just discussing when and how it is determined that a sell on fee will be paid in terms of installments.

That link is actually the one I used to get my information on sell on fees previously and has a very clear interpretation of how rulings were made on installments in regards to sell on fees - especially in contractual matters.

As you can see from the link, on a couple of occasions, legal action was taken by clubs in regards to not receiving payment up front or (on time) as expected - as it was stated in the contracts. The FIFA PSC ruled on every occasion that a club would not be enforced to pay any sell on fees until they had received their share first.

Like I said, it's not a contractual issue, it's a football governing issue on transfers and how they are enforced.

[Taunton Blue Genie]

I'm well aware of that, but we're not discussing all of the semantics of a sell on fee - we're just discussing when and how it is determined that a sell on fee will be paid in terms of installments.

That link is actually the one I used to get my information on sell on fees previously and has a very clear interpretation of how rulings were made on installments in regards to sell on fees - especially in contractual matters.

As you can see from the link, on a couple of occasions, legal action was taken by clubs in regards to not receiving payment up front or (on time) as expected - as it was stated in the contracts. The FIFA PSC ruled on every occasion that a club would not be enforced to pay any sell on fees until they had received their share first.

Like I said, it's not a contractual issue, it's a football governing issue on transfers and how they are enforced.

I understand what you are saying, brother blood. I bet the selling club doesn't contribute to any loss when a player is sold on