Incident at London Bridge

[xsnaggle]

Shooting the culprits won't bring back the victims and is morally wrong, as is any taking of life.

I think political leaders she attend the shot mens funerals, give condolences to their extended families and lay wreaths at the graves, just to show them we bear them no malice.

We have to talk to these people!!!!!!!

[bobh]

Shooting the culprits won't bring back the victims and is morally wrong, as is any taking of life.

I think political leaders she attend the shot mens funerals, give condolences to their extended families and lay wreaths at the graves, just to show them we bear them no malice.

We have to talk to these people!!!!!!!

They should be taken alive where possible (if no threat to innocents or police)
then handed over to MI5 (MI6 ?) where they can be tortured until they rat on their accomplices.

THEN shot.

[xsnaggle]

[QUOTE=bobh;4747409]

They should be taken alive where possible (if no threat to innocents or police)
then handed over to MI5 (MI6 ?) where they can be tortured until they rat on their accomplices.

THEN shot.[/QUOTE}}

hope your day gets better.

[lardy]

Shooting the culprits won't bring back the victims and is morally wrong, as is any taking of life.

I think political leaders she attend the shot mens funerals, give condolences to their extended families and lay wreaths at the graves, just to show them we bear them no malice.

We have to talk to these people!!!!!!!

This is not what should happen.

[BLUETIT]

Shooting the culprits won't bring back the victims and is morally wrong, as is any taking of life.

I think political leaders she attend the shot mens funerals, give condolences to their extended families and lay wreaths at the graves, just to show them we bear them no malice.

We have to talk to these people!!!!!!!

This is not what should happen.

I am confused, which bit should not happen ?

The shooting of them, or the talking to them ?

[lardy]

I am confused, which bit should not happen ?

The shooting of them, or the talking to them ?

Political leaders attending funerals and laying wreaths on their graves, I'm sorry I thought it would have been obvious.

I'm assuming we're talking about the terrorists.

[Auntie Andy]

Shooting the culprits won't bring back the victims and is morally wrong, as is any taking of life.

I think political leaders she attend the shot mens funerals, give condolences to their extended families and lay wreaths at the graves, just to show them we bear them no malice.

We have to talk to these people!!!!!!!

Yes, because dropping 1200 bombs in Iraq and Syria since 2004 killing 1 million innocent civilians has clearly worked hasn't it

[Cleve van Leef]

Shooting the culprits won't bring back the victims and is morally wrong, as is any taking of life.

I think political leaders she attend the shot mens funerals, give condolences to their extended families and lay wreaths at the graves, just to show them we bear them no malice.

We have to talk to these people!!!!!!!

Wrong on all counts.

[xsnaggle]

Wrong on all counts.

Don't any of you people reckognise a whoosh when you read one. I was thinking of our Jeremy and his IRA and Palastinian friends!!!!!!!

I wont fecking bother any more.

[Kris]

Shooting the culprits won't bring back the victims and is morally wrong, as is any taking of life.

I think political leaders she attend the shot mens funerals, give condolences to their extended families and lay wreaths at the graves, just to show them we bear them no malice.

We have to talk to these people!!!!!!!

Who do we talk to then? These people are usually acting alone, or in small groups. It's debatable that they have any contact with ISIS at all. OK, ISIS will claim responsibility. They also claimed responsibility for a casino attack in Manila on Thursday which appears to have had no ISIS links at all!

I am liberal (although not as liberal as you). It is pointless talking to them. I agree that arresting them would be much more beneficial but, come on, 3 men with foot long knives stabbing people in crowded areas indiscriminately. The police have to act fast and, that they did, has surely saved many lives.

I think that anyone convicted of organising a terrorist attack should be jailed for life, with absolutely no contact with the outside world. Anyone suspected of radicalising young kids, and turning them into weapons should face a similar crime. Furthermore, deporting non-UK citizens is not something I think we should do. Far better to have them in our penal system.

The Government needs to invest more in intelligence, but we as people should absolutely fight back against any threats to our privacy. Any new laws should be specific and, considering we are in a war of sorts, then convicting people as Prisoners of War on concrete evidence (and I appreciate this would become open to abuse and/or a tool for further radicalisation) for the duration of the war is something that I feel is an appropriate step.

One other thing, we as a country need to look at ourselves. How often do we exclude people, ignore people, or fail to bring people from a foreign country into our communities? How often do we hear that "50 insurgents were killed" and think - bingo, we got 'em? The fact is, if a bomb is dropped on a house with two insurgents, all other people killed are also labelled insurgents, whether they are grown men, women, kids, old folk. To us 50 insurgents are wiped off the face of the planet, and it's 1-0 to the good guys. To them, 48 innocent people have been murdered. In these situations, people have a right to be angry, don't they?

Let's change our foreign policy, it is designed to protect us by killing potential enemies in far flung lands. In effect, it's galvanising the radicalisation movement of British citizens against British citizens.

[Something Blue]

Let's change our foreign policy, it is designed to protect us by killing potential enemies in far flung lands. In effect, it's galvanising the radicalisation movement of British citizens against British citizens.

Isis have gone on record and in print to say that they hate us, and our foreign policy is secondary to their aim.