+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
In case you haven't been following the thread, it was an expert in phychological operations and false flags who called it out, a person who btw carried out these kinds of operations on behalf of 4 previous US presidents. So in the grand scheme of things, who am I to doubt the veracity of his words?
And as per usual, you resort to personal attacks when trying to make something align with your own personal beliefs. It's called confirmation bias, and it is easily cured by simply opening your eyes
Just because someone is an expert at something doesn't mean they're 100% right all the time, what he said was grotesque and I'd say arguing that the 3rd largest mass-shooting in US history never happened at best makes him an unreliable source and at worst makes him a complete lunatic
"Personal attack"? Really? Is saying that its mental that you'd deny a mass murder really a "personal attack"?
If anyone has their "eyes shut" here it's you. Evidence has been provided by many in this thread and yet you refuse to accept it as it doesn't fit into your anti "mainstream media" viewpoint
There's also plenty of evidence out there to show Sandy Hook was open and the "school wasn't in operation" theory has been debunked, unfortunately Sandy Hook did happen, its way too big of a tragedy to not have happened
I though it was a discussion forum? I've always said we need to wait for things to be proved one way or the other. There are the MSM version of events, and also the alternative media view of everything. Who will come out on top? Watch this space, but I did correctly state many months ago that the Russian hacking story would be a nothingburger