+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
No of course it isnt, and of course i dont think that either, and to be honest you have to have a line, you used the single mother and nappies, i know a number of people in the US and that single mother would get help ( mainly from churchy types, but thats got to be better than prison ? ? ? ) I know a High school teacher who spent the summer taking " extra lessons " in his school and buying 9 pupils lunch everyday, the " lunch service " ( which is free for these pupils ) had stopped as its the summer holidays , these pupils had no interest in the lessons, but they came to school to be fed, so help is around
the likely shoplifter will be the junkie who " steals " to fund his / her habit, i know this will open up another discussion about " they are addicts / they have a illness etc etc "
Its not perfect, but the guy i used as a example is doing his best to make it work
oh and it has disney world, so its not all bad
They deserve help ( which they are given ) and the chance to be clean
Do you think these addicts deserve the rights to shoplift and rob people to fund the habit ? ? ?? as if they are not in prison that is what they are doing
The attitude of Blue Matt and Dembethewarrior is pretty depressing isn't it? Can't just be me that thinks that.
A life sentence. A LIFE SENTENCE for that? Doesn't it seem disproportionate?
As was suggested with speeding, no one lives 100% within the law 100% of the time. Would you really want to live in a country that operates like that? If so, perhaps there are some in the middle east you might like.
from my knowledge not in a alot of US states, most minor traffic violations are " misdemeanours " of course it varies from state to state
See above, Did i say i wanted to live in a country like that ? ? ?
you might have missed the content i used it in, here it is, just below for you to read again, 46 offences inc 5 sexual offences
If you are referring to my post below, i was pointing out shoplifting is a crime, my 2nd sentence was purely tongue-in-cheek about " accidentally shoplifting " apologies if my tongue-in-cheek caused you to be offended, but last time i checked humour wasnt banned on the internet
The original post is about a guy who certainly shouldn't be allowed to roam the streets. The post of yours I quoted is about shoplifting from first word to last.
"shoplifting is a crime, lets not forget that
If i was caught accidentally shoplifting twice, i know i would be very careful to pay for my stuff, infact i might write myself a note " I must pay for my shopping ""
------
The point is, shoplifting is a crime that you and others probably don't do. So you're in favour of zero tolerance. But why should there be tolerance for all the crimes that you do? A speeding car/window cleaning van can kill someone. Pocketing something in a shop probably won't.
Apologies for offending you by saying you wanted to live in a middle east country. That's how it works, right?