Oxford Vaccine

[lardy]

Many more clot shot victims collapsing in this news report.

The anchor says 94% of the Covid vaccinated have abnormal blood.

COVID-19 VACCINATED PEOPLE SUFFERING STRANGE HALLUCINATIONS BEFORE COLLAPSING - https://www.bitchute.com/video/klJ2yt2gvBB6/

Help me a little with the maths. Is 94% of 5 billion people a lot or not?

Because if it's a lot of people affected, then I would expect to have heard a bit more about it than from you and nowhere else at all.

[Organ Morgan.]

Help me a little with the maths. Is 94% of 5 billion people a lot or not?

Because if it's a lot of people affected, then I would expect to have heard a bit more about it than from you and nowhere else at all.

The host of that news report said it. Put your specs on.

You will be able to hear him say it should you watch it.

I post links to lots of stuff you won't see on your precious goggle box. One I've included several times of late is to Pfizer's Covid trial side effects where they noted 1,294 different ones. You haven't heard that from the Beeb or the NHS or any politician even though it is demonstrably true, and yet it's still being pushed the way of British parents and guardians of those with children as young as five years.

No doubt that censorship is something you heartily agree with despite being unable to claim you're unaware of the staggering number of side-effects Pfizer and the FDA wanted to conceal for the next 76 years. You and the other Teletubbies ought to give your head a shake instead of tacitly supporting this protocol. Shame on all of you for your complicity.

[lardy]

The host of that news report said it. Put your specs on.

You will be able to hear him say it should you watch it.

I post links to lots of stuff you won't see on your precious goggle box. One I've included several times of late is to Pfizer's Covid trial side effects where they noted 1,294 different ones. You haven't heard that from the Beeb or the NHS or any politician even though it is demonstrably true, and yet it's still being pushed the way of British parents and guardians of those with children as young as five years.

No doubt that censorship is something you heartily agree with despite being unable to claim you're unaware of the staggering number of side-effects Pfizer and the FDA wanted to conceal for the next 76 years. You and the other Teletubbies ought to give your head a shake instead of tacitly supporting this protocol. Shame on all of you for your complicity.

I think you might be missing the point. If 4.5 billion people now have abnormal blood which causes sudden collapsing then we wouldn't be learning about it on the gogglebox, it would be a very obvious part of our reality already.

It is very quaint btw, and quite telling about your advanced age, that you think we all spend our time watching BBC and ITV.

[Organ Morgan.]

I think you might be missing the point. If 4.5 billion people now have abnormal blood which causes sudden collapsing then we wouldn't be learning about it on the gogglebox, it would be a very obvious part of our reality already.

It is very quaint btw, and quite telling about your advanced age, that you think we all spend our time watching BBC and ITV.

I note you, along with your TV-loving brethren always have precisely nowt to say about those Pfizer-admitted 1,294 different adverse reactions. It's always divert and deflect, never discourse.

"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice.

[lardy]

I note you, along with your TV-loving brethren always have precisely nowt to say about those Pfizer-admitted 1,294 different adverse reactions. It's always divert and deflect, never discourse.

"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice.

Just about all medications have adverse effects, more commonly called side effects. Your doctor is supposed to tell you when he prescribes it.

Most side effects are not serious, and in your pdf (which I have looked at) this is also true of their results.

Of the serious side effects, they are fractions of a percent of the total number of doses. In other words, very rare - on the scale of a few in a million.

Now I've responded to that, perhaps you can respond to my query about why, if 4.5 billion people have blood which causes them to spontaneously collapse, nobody knows anybody who knows anybody who has experienced it? Could it be because it's just not true?

[Organ Morgan.]

Same horse. I paraphrased what he said.

Returning once more to what you're extremely reticent to comment on. I can't think why.

Below I've pasted a tiny fraction of Pfizer's listed adverse reactions. Have you any remarks to make pertaining to them?

Still's disease;Stoma site thrombosis;Stoma site
vasculitis;Stress cardiomyopathy;Stridor;Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus;Subacute
endocarditis;Subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy;Subclavian artery
embolism;Subclavian artery thrombosis;Subclavian vein thrombosis;Sudden unexplained
death in epilepsy;Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis;Susac's syndrome;Suspected COVID19;Swelling;Swelling face;Swelling of eyelid;Swollen tongue;Sympathetic
ophthalmia;Systemic lupus erythematosus;Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity
index abnormal;Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index decreased;Systemic
lupus erythematosus disease activity index increased;Systemic lupus erythematosus
rash

Just about all medications have adverse effects, more commonly called side effects. Your doctor is supposed to tell you when he prescribes it.

Most side effects are not serious, and in your pdf (which I have looked at) this is also true of their results.

Of the serious side effects, they are fractions of a percent of the total number of doses. In other words, very rare - on the scale of a few in a million.

Now I've responded to that, perhaps you can respond to my query about why, if 4.5 billion people have blood which causes them to spontaneously collapse, nobody knows anybody who knows anybody who has experienced it? Could it be because it's just not true?

I hadn't heard anyone claim 94% of the blood of the clot shotted was abnormal before hearing that host say it.

As Montagnier, Cahill and some others have hypothesised though, it's a soft kill/slow kill aka delayed kill bioweapon.

[lardy]

I hadn't heard anyone claim 94% of the blood of the clot shotted was abnormal before hearing that host say it.

As Montagnier, Cahill and some others have hypothesised though, it's a soft kill/slow kill aka delayed kill bioweapon.

So shall we assume that the claim is bollocks?

Or shall we gormlessly nod along with our mouth slightly open at everything we see on the internet, no matter how clearly implausible it is?

Montagnier died months ago at the ripe old age of 89 by the way, and was heavily criticised by other academics for his nutty COVID-19 views.