My understanding at the time was that he was brought in as one for the future. That might have been a good ploy. However, we didn't buy a decent striker that was ready to start games, neither did we invest in any pace. For a while we worked hard and ground out the odd result here and there, but the limitations of the squad were all too evident. In that respect, it was a mistake to have signed Cornelius, simply because the money would have been better spent on someone who, hopefully, would have started most games that season.Originally Posted by LordKenwyne
He was just used as a stick to bash mackay when he wasn't given a chance.
Pro Tan'ers did what Tan did and tried to discredit everything he did.
What did he have, like 1 start in the league cup?
Reply With Quote