'Fake news' inquiry launched

[lardy]

They probably will, lots of pro Trump stuff is being flagged as fake news on facebook, you can even get yourself a Trump filter if you are that pathetic and you can't handle seeing stories about him. (not you, anyone)
http://trumpfilter.com/

Shouldn't we wait until they actually do before concluding that the Mail is banned for having an opposing view (whatever that is).

Not sure what facebook is to do with wikipedia, mind.

[Wales-Bales]

Not sure what facebook is to do with wikipedia, mind.

Liberals, Soros, EU, Facebook, Twitter, Google, MSM, Blairites, Wikipedia, multinationals, socialists, communists, and a multitude of other secret groups are all on the same side, as are you

[lardy]

Liberals, Soros, EU, Facebook, Twitter, Google, MSM, Blairites, Wikipedia, multinationals, socialists, communists, and a multitude of other secret groups are all on the same side, as are you

The Mail is on the same side as the EU.

Okey dokey.

[Wales-Bales]

The Mail is on the same side as the EU.

Okey dokey.

The mail are on the side of those who are trying to save humanity

[severncity]

Shouldn't we wait until they actually do before concluding that the Mail is banned for having an opposing view (whatever that is).

Not sure what facebook is to do with wikipedia, mind.

Politics or geopolitics is about overlapping factions, each with their own ideologies and interests, all of which are continually shifting and changing, and all of which are constituted of individual people with their own needs, desires, perversions, secrets and personal relationships.

I'm lucky enough to have worked in Plaid Cymru HQ -Ty Gwynfor - for the final year of Plaid's coalition government with Labour so I've seen first hand how quickly factions can form and dissolve.

The owners (and editor) of the Daily Mail have overlapping interests with members of various factions - for example certain wealthy UK people, prominent members of the Conservatives and UKIP, media like Breitbart.

Wikipedia, on the other hand, has overlapping interests with people like the Clintons and organisations like Facebook.

Understanding this is not very complicated but the relationships are infinitely complex.

[Wales-Bales]

Politics or geopolitics is about overlapping factions, each with their own ideologies and interests, all of which are continually shifting and changing, and all of which are constituted of individual people with their own needs, desires, perversions, secrets and personal relationships.

I'm lucky enough to have worked in Plaid Cymru HQ -Ty Gwynfor - for the final year of Plaid's coalition government with Labour so I've seen first hand how quickly factions can form and dissolve.

The owners (and editor) of the Daily Mail have overlapping interests with members of various factions - for example certain wealthy UK people, prominent members of the Conservatives and UKIP, media like Breitbart.

Wikipedia, on the other hand, has overlapping interests with people like the Clintons and organisations like Facebook.

Understanding this is not very complicated but the relationships are infinitely complex.

You are dealing with lardy here though

[lardy]

Politics or geopolitics is about overlapping factions, each with their own ideologies and interests, all of which are continually shifting and changing, and all of which are constituted of individual people with their own needs, desires, perversions, secrets and personal relationships.

I'm lucky enough to have worked in Plaid Cymru HQ -Ty Gwynfor - for the final year of Plaid's coalition government with Labour so I've seen first hand how quickly factions can form and dissolve.

The owners (and editor) of the Daily Mail have overlapping interests with members of various factions - for example certain wealthy UK people, prominent members of the Conservatives and UKIP, media like Breitbart.

Wikipedia, on the other hand, has overlapping interests with people like the Clintons and organisations like Facebook.

Understanding this is not very complicated but the relationships are infinitely complex.

I agree that the relationships are very complex. This is why 'so-and-so and some others are all together on one side' is too simplistic and not accurate. Just to pick newspapers as an example, we've seen some suddenly jump ship many times.

[Wales-Bales]

I agree that the relationships are very complex. This is why 'so-and-so and some others are all together on one side' is too simplistic and not accurate. Just to pick newspapers as an example, we've seen some suddenly jump ship many times.

Most groups and indiduals have now stepped out from the shadows, so it's fairly trivial to see who is who. A few double agents are still in place acting as agent provocateurs, but what we are now witnessing is a full-on information war, and the stakes are very high indeed. I also think it's fair to say that so far we have only witnessed the opening skirmishes, with both sides keeping their heavy artillery in reserve.