Quote Originally Posted by Kris View Post
I found porn by accident, and a number of my mates had access to all sorts of videos when we still had squeaky voices. This was about 1990.

Obviously, I don't want my kid seeing porn and it is my responsibility to make sure it doesn't happen. Likewise, I don't really expect people to supply identifiable information when indulging in a private pursuit (as long as it is legal of course).

This is data collection, and it has sinister implications - "the person suspected of this crime watched a lot of midget porn", "the person applying for this job likes watching a lot of group sex porn".

This will not stop kids from seeing porn, but I doubt that that is the real objective here.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.p...ddictive%3famp

It's always nice to add some real science.
I hadn't even got started on the sinister implications yet the thing is though you don't have to watch porn online, you could have a huge collection of dvds if you wanted, putting your details in will be the price you have to pay if you want a constant supply of new films.

As for the "real science" dig, are you saying sites like TED should not be trusted?

Did your example have to include midget porn?