Huddersfield's 10 changes

[the other bob wilson]

‘It leaves a nasty taste in my mouth’

http://talksport.com/football/it-lea...-weakened-team

The rules say Huddersfield were wrong, there are precedents which say they were wrong and now our manager is saying it was wrong.

[OurManFlint II]

‘It leaves a nasty taste in my mouth’

http://talksport.com/football/it-lea...-weakened-team

The rules say Huddersfield were wrong, there are precedents which say they were wrong and now our manager is saying it was wrong.

No shit Warnock has a nasty taste, he needed a win at home against Wigan but failed to a penalty....nothing to do with any other team other than his and the referee in THAT game.

Again if its wrong, league need to make it clear and simple not teams!

[the other bob wilson]

No shit Warnock has a nasty taste, he needed a win at home against Wigan but failed to a penalty....nothing to do with any other team other than his and the referee in THAT game.

Again if its wrong, league need to make it clear and simple not teams!

I would have thought that having it in the rules and fining sides who have done it in the past was making it clear and simple .

[OurManFlint II]

I would have thought that having it in the rules and fining sides who have done it in the past was making it clear and simple .

So strange then that team persist with something that is clear and simple

I thought the league confirmed the result will stand, as it did when Shef Utd failed to win at home

[William Treseder]

‘It leaves a nasty taste in my mouth’

http://talksport.com/football/it-lea...-weakened-team

The rules say Huddersfield were wrong, there are precedents which say they were wrong and now our manager is saying it was wrong.

Can't believe your getting your knickers in a twist about this! Can you explain to me, with all your football knowledge, why Huddersfield should give a shit about Forest, Blackburn etc?
We laugh when club owners try to interfere with a managers team choice or tactics, but you think it's ok for the FA to do the same?
Huddersfield have a legitimate, pre season named squad, like every other team in the world. How they use that squad should be up to the manager alone.
Wasn't too many of our fans complaining when Malky played a weakened team against Macclesfield, resulting in the worst result in our history.
Good luck to the terriers. I hope they get their promotion. The likes of Forest and Blackburn should have won more points throughout the season.

[lardy]

Can't believe your getting your knickers in a twist about this! Can you explain to me, with all your football knowledge, why Huddersfield should give a shit about Forest, Blackburn etc?
We laugh when club owners try to interfere with a managers team choice or tactics, but you think it's ok for the FA to do the same?
Huddersfield have a legitimate, pre season named squad, like every other team in the world. How they use that squad should be up to the manager alone.
Wasn't too many of our fans complaining when Malky played a weakened team against Macclesfield, resulting in the worst result in our history.
Good luck to the terriers. I hope they get their promotion. The likes of Forest and Blackburn should have won more points throughout the season.

Loads of city fans complained about the Macclesfield game. Far more, on here, were unhappy than happy.

[William Treseder]

Loads of city fans complained about the Macclesfield game. Far more, on here, were unhappy than happy.

Sorry Lardy. Think your wrong there. There were far more posters who didn't give a shit about it than those who did.