What's the answer?Originally Posted by jon1959
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
What's the answer?
I asked you a question. Why are you turning it back on me? If you don't know, or refuse to say, that is fine. You are entitled to either ignorance or evasion, and you have history.
My answer is the total opposite of whatever lardy says. Even though we both have access to exactly the same sources of information, only one of us has been duped. It will be interesting to see who that person is. Maybe we will have to reappraise this new trend of putting people on ignore just because they have superior analysis skills?
I'll answer that. You asked whether Trump is "innocent ", rather than whether he's guilty, and id honestly say that's a clue that maybe you've been - quite innocently - influenced a bit by biased sources.
I'd say that he's certainly not guilty of either of the things you mention , but I couldn't say , and it's not reasonable to expect anyone to say or prove that he's "innocent".
The fact is that there's no evidence that he's guilty and just as we don't go around saying that you or anyone else committed a crime because they haven't proved their innocence of it, we can't reasonably assume the President's guilt just because no one has disproved an apparently malicious allegation by his political opponents.
I would say though, that if they've failed to discover enough evidence to proceed after the amount of time money and effort they've devoted to it, then it seems unlikely that it exists.
To whom it may concern
This thread is to do with Operation Yellowhammer not Donald Trump
If you want to argue about Trump
DO IT IN THE TRUMP THREAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That will be jon1959 and lardy who you want to have a word with then.
BTW Brexit and Trump's election are one and the same thing, you cannot sperate them. Everything from ideology, media interference and the involvement of intel agencies is all connected. In short, it's a global battle for domination between two competing ideologies.
You are the one who first mentioned Trump. And the Russia collusion investigation in the USA. And Lardy - who (with Cyril) you always name check when you want to deflect. And of course someone else is responsible for taking the thread off track! Classic Trump. And to bring it back home, classic Boris Johnson too!
How if I refer to them as the charlatans?
Should your reasonable request fail to overcome obsessive behaviour you could always try treating the distraction at source. Probably halve the number of posts you read and improve their relevance.
As opposed to reading all your disinfo shite
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote