There you go. Which one did you use to reach your damning conclusion?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...rged-yearbook/
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/roy-m...posts_card_hed
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
There you go. Which one did you use to reach your damning conclusion?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...rged-yearbook/
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/roy-m...posts_card_hed
Regarding this matter I specifically called out the faked yearbook, and the witnesses who disputed the accusers version of events, which seem to be an accurate observations on my part.
This now also raises a doubt about the lawyer who is running all of these cases.
That wasn't the question I asked. As per previous posts there are an array of women giving a pattern of evidence against Moore. Do you believe that at a point in his life at least he had at best an unhealthy interest in young and underage women or is it all a plot by Democrats and agenda lawyers to unfairly discredit him. You must have a view given the material you have previously posted.
As you're so desperate for me to chip in, I shall. Fox has updated the story that got you excited - '...admits faking the message in her yearbook!'
"An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as 'notes' beneath what she says is Roy Moore's signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location.
"Furthermore, the headline on [the] story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...candidate.html
The accuracy of your statements is notable, but not in the way you think...