No, you've got that completely wrong. It's not that owning property and the right to do so which was changed, it's that the definition of what property is that was changed. The point was that a human being could no longer be considered property.Originally Posted by Heisenberg
Of course there already are laws to prevent convicted felons or mentally ill people from owning or having guns, which is obviously a good idea.
You take me up on the use of the word "irresponsible " but I said " committed a crime OR been irresponsible ". No reasonable interpretation of that as a description of mass murder is possible . Of course you have to be responsible with guns in that you don't leave them lying round where the kids can get hold of them or anything.
Reply With Quote