View Full Version : Gary Glitter case
Giving evidence, the woman, now aged 48, said she had been taken to meet him by her mother and her mother's partner - who worked in the music industry.
The singer then asked if the girl could be left alone with him, she said.
The glam rock artist, who was still wearing a silver sequinned jumpsuit, then asked her to sit on his lap. He asked her for a kiss, before sexually assaulting, she said.
The ordeal lasted for about 10 minutes and only stopped when there was a knock on the dressing room door, she added.
I dont get it either
i am a fan of michael jackson's music and i do feel at times he was set-up by parents who would let young children have a " sleepover " with him and then claim he was a wrong un, this went on and on and i can only imagine it was for a payout, but what kind of sick fooker pimps out your own child to earn a few bob ? ? ?
the same with Glitter, why on earth would you leave your child alone with him when he asks " can i be alone with your daughter ", would alarm bells ring ? ? ? or where they different times back then ? ? ?
Why has it taken so long to report this?
Didn't one parent leave their (13?) y/o daughter with him overnight?
WTF?
is it:
'ooh yes, well of course my little girls been f****d by Gary Glitter .. beat that Mums ..'
? really?
Why has it taken so long to report this?I assume that is what you are alluding to? http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/shrug.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZ2p8_4pqTI
Dumbos on this thread : The general public didn't know about all these paedo perves back then.
However I am sure that people in the music industry / the BBC did know so all of those people should be
under the cosh too.
Cardiff Irish
23-01-15, 17:22
Found his greatest hits the other day amongst some old CDs.
I felt guilty for playing 'Hello'
Especially when believe it or not it's from an album called 'Touch me'
saw him at the capitol 1973 , never touched me. dissapointed
Why has it taken so long to report this?
What is the reason for your questioning that?He was outed as pervert in the late '90s so why did it take so lonng for this woman to come forward?
Dumbos on this thread : The general public didn't know about all these paedo perves back then.I didnt know this, i am in my 40's and i guess from a different time than back then, BUT i wouldnt let my daughter spend time alone with some " pop star etc etc "
Taunton Blue Genie
23-01-15, 18:39
Why has it taken so long to report this?
What is the reason for your questioning that?
The Jury will decide if she is making it up.Maybe it is rather a painful and traumatic experience.
Dumbos on this thread : The general public didn't know about all these paedo perves back then.
so back in the day, it was never heard of / public didnt know about Peado's ?? ? no one in their right mind would!
Mrs Steve R
23-01-15, 20:07
He used to live in Burnham where I grew up, he would stand in the high street with kids all around him, a right slimey git, gives me the creeps just thinking about it.
He used to live in Burnham where I grew up, he would stand in the high street with kids all around him, a right slimey git, gives me the creeps just thinking about it.you are 95 years old
Mrs Steve R
23-01-15, 20:49
He used to live in Burnham where I grew up, he would stand in the high street with kids all around him, a right slimey git, gives me the creeps just thinking about it.
you are 95 years oldHow do you work that out? http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif
Dumbos on this thread : The general public didn't know about all these paedo perves back then.I dont think its a simple as that, again why would you sensibly agree to a request from a pop star asking you to leave whilst your 13 year old daughter was left in the room with him, its almost as is if it was arranged http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/sherlock.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZ2p8_4pqTI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZ2p8_4pqTI)Eeeeeek that is a strange moment , body language says it all.
bluebirds over.......
24-01-15, 01:11
It's always seemed strange to me how all they've all come out of the woodwork years after the alleged abuse, of course it's got nothing to do with the big pay outs up for grabs.
Dumbos on this thread : The general public didn't know about all these paedo perves back then.
However I am sure that people in the music industry / the BBC did know so all of those people should beeven back then we knew that pop / rock stars were randy perverted buggers
tigerbaybluebird
24-01-15, 11:59
It's always seemed strange to me how all they've all come out of the woodwork years after the alleged abuse, of course it's got nothing to do with the big pay outs up for grabs.It could be that they have reported this previously but it's been "covered up" untill now http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/sherlock.gif
It always seems odd to me that some peoples first reaction is that women and men who report or give evidence against historic abuse must somehow be in it for something.
Or liars.
Or out to discredit the alleged perpetrator. (Bit late to avoid 'discredit' eh Jimmy, Gary ..et-al)
Most victims will just want justice and partial 'freedom' from the painful memories they may have carried with them for years.
It doesn't even add up that they stand to gain much.
To name only two - Savile is dead. Glitter is bankrupt.
To my mind it tells me something(s) about the kind of person who comes up with that notion as their first thought.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.