View Full Version : Katie Hopkins
:hehe:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40057165
Why are people like this (c*nts) still being employed for expressing hatred?
There are so many things wrong with the "western world" and this is right up there, influencing more and more people to be racist.
LordKenwyne
26-05-17, 09:51
People are calling for farage to be sacked.
You may not agree with him but he speaks quite eloquently most of the time.
And she is on another playing field in regard to caused hatred against people. That final solution comment is inexcusable.
Perhaps some of the public should take part of the blame for MAKING these so called celebrities in the first place.
Things like TOWIE, that Chelksie one, Big Brother and others.
If people didn't watch this shit, then these type of people would never have a platform to preach their bile
Barry Shitpeas
26-05-17, 10:15
It's really not on to laugh at someone losing their job. In this case I'll make an exception :hehe::hehe::hehe:
Colonel Cærdiffi
26-05-17, 10:29
I do not agree with her opinion on this or pretty much anything but doesn't she have a right to express her opinion, reprehensible as it may be?
I do not agree with her opinion on this or pretty much anything but doesn't she have a right to express her opinion, reprehensible as it may be?
Yes she has a right to express he opinion.
The radio station also have the right to employ her or not.
If you become more hassle than you are worth to your employer they will get rid or you.
Colonel Cærdiffi
26-05-17, 10:40
Yes she has a right to express he opinion.
The radio station also have the right to employ her or not.
If you become more hassle than you are worth to your employer they will get rid or you.
Well I don't like your opinion so rather than debate you I'm going to find out where you work and put pressure on your employer to sack you publicly.
Well I don't like your opinion so rather than debate you I'm going to find out where you work and put pressure on your employer to sack you publicly.
Katie Hopkins was employed because she is controversial, and then people would phone up and argue with her. LBC knew this and they have been fine with people calling up asking her to be sacked. companies like LBC need phone calls to create content.
However LBC are a commercial station, what would have happened is the companies that advertise would have put pressure on LBC to do something otherwise they will pull their advertising. At that point LBC need to do something.
LBC have been fine with members of the public not being happy with Hopkins and Farage broadcasting for a good while now.
Well I don't like your opinion so rather than debate you I'm going to find out where you work and put pressure on your employer to sack you publicly.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. She got the job because of her controversial views and she's now lost the job because she's had to keep upping the ante. It was only a matter of time.
Was she sacked because of public pressure?
Colonel Cærdiffi
26-05-17, 10:49
Katie Hopkins was employed because she is controversial, and then people would phone up and argue with her. LBC knew this and they have been fine with people calling up asking her to be sacked. companies like LBC need phone calls to create content.
However LBC are a commercial station, what would have happened is the companies that advertise would have put pressure on LBC to do something otherwise they will pull their advertising. At that point LBC need to do something.
LBC have been fine with members of the public not being happy with Hopkins and Farage broadcasting for a good while now.
Same thing. People didn't like her opinion, pressure was put on other people to get her ousted.
I doubt her opinion changed, I doubt her followers opinions changed either. If anything this sort of action just galvanises them further. I don't see how silencing someone via sacking is healthier than debate.
Pedro de la Rosa
26-05-17, 10:50
I do not agree with her opinion on this or pretty much anything but doesn't she have a right to express her opinion, reprehensible as it may be?
Within reason, you could argue what she said was inciting racial hatred. Also, LBC has absolutely no obligation to give her a platform. I would imagine they have come under pressure from advertisers to get rid of her as they don't want to be associated with her.
Same thing. People didn't like her opinion, pressure was put on other people to get her ousted.
I doubt her opinion changed, I doubt her followers opinions changed either. If anything this sort of action just galvanises them further. I don't see how silencing someone via sacking is healthier than debate.
You can have the debate. You dont have the right for it to be broadcast.
If companies pull their advertising the station cannot survive.
I can act like an idiot in work, as long as im good at my job i'll keep being employed. If i annoy the people who pay the bills and they take their custom elsewhere, they need to get rid of me.
Well I don't like your opinion so rather than debate you I'm going to find out where you work and put pressure on your employer to sack you publicly.
There's a big difference between disliking someone's opinion and that opinion crossing the line into dubious legality
Colonel Cærdiffi
26-05-17, 10:52
Live by the sword, die by the sword. She got the job because of her controversial views and she's now lost the job because she's had to keep upping the ante. It was only a matter of time.
Was she sacked because of public pressure?
Well, like qccfc says, her employers had advertisers who would have considered her bad for business.
We can debate the rights and wrongs of that all day but it's still just a form of censorship of an unpopular opinion, it seems to me.
Colonel Cærdiffi
26-05-17, 10:54
your all idoits
your all idoits
"You're" , "idiots" :wave:
Your opinion of us is your opinion and you are entitled to it. It may even be factual. It certainly wouldn't be considered illegal to express it :thumbup:
"You're" , "idiots" :wave:
Your opinion of us is your opinion and you are entitled to it. It may even be factual. It certainly wouldn't be considered illegal to express it :thumbup:
he also spelt "not" rong its not not all omgs
Well, like qccfc says, her employers had advertisers who would have considered her bad for business.
We can debate the rights and wrongs of that all day but it's still just a form of censorship of an unpopular opinion, it seems to me.
Advertisers pay her wages, she's under the same restraints as all of us. Don't push your luck with the people who pay you.
She's still got twitter which I would say is a much bigger audience than her LBC show.
Colonel Cærdiffi
26-05-17, 11:02
"You're" , "idiots" :wave:
Your opinion of us is your opinion and you are entitled to it. It may even be factual. It certainly wouldn't be considered illegal to express it :thumbup:
Oh Tony.
:frown:
Advertisers pay her wages, she's under the same restraints as all of us. Don't push your luck with the people who pay you.
She's still got twitter which I would say is a much bigger audience than her LBC show.
And she writes a column in the daily mail. Which is prominently shown online. She is hardly being censored.
Alfonso Perez
26-05-17, 11:07
I do not agree with her opinion on this or pretty much anything but doesn't she have a right to express her opinion, reprehensible as it may be?
Odious woman but I agree with you
Colonel Cærdiffi
26-05-17, 11:08
Odious woman but I agree with you
Thank you. It would appear everyone else in this thread agrees with us too.
CardiffIrish2
26-05-17, 11:25
What's the world coming to when you can't ask for a Holocaust these days eh?
tigerbaybluebird
26-05-17, 11:26
Im glad she got the sack the ugly big nose cow
Funnily enough she's not made one comment on the student Damon Smith getting 15 years today ( he should have a whole life sentance) for leaving a bomb filled with ball bearings on the tube in London
sneggyblubird
26-05-17, 12:20
I do not agree with her opinion on this or pretty much anything but doesn't she have a right to express her opinion, reprehensible as it may be?
Yes she does have a right but also has a platform and an advantage the likes of me and you don't and that doesn't come free.Her opinion can and does influence others where yours or mine doesn't. She is however the prime validation for the saying "theres no such thing as bad publicity".I dare say she'll be back.
Everyone has a right to an opinion and free speech, what they don't have is the right to a large platform, that is a privilege and she over-stepped the mark and lost that privilege
Croesy Blue
26-05-17, 14:43
I do not agree with her opinion on this or pretty much anything but doesn't she have a right to express her opinion, reprehensible as it may be?
She still does have the right to express her opinion though, just not on the radio anymore.
People need to realise free speech doesn't mean you can say what you want without consequence.
What has she said this time?
The Colonel is right. She can express her views but if they incite violence she will have broken the law and will have to pay a penalty
The Colonel is right. She can express her views but if they incite violence she will have broken the law and will have to pay a penalty
The spelling on this board is getting worse, we all know it should be pelanty..
Quite how she kept any kind of media work after this article was incredible, especially after the dead child washed up ashore.
'Rescue boats? I'd use gun ships on migrants'
"Show me pictures of coffins, show me bodies floating in water, play violins and show me skinny people looking sad. I still don't care".
Bluebirdman Of Alcathays
26-05-17, 16:46
There's a tacit agreement in free speech that the floor is open for everyone. KH reneged on the agreement with her suggestions of a final solution for Muslims. She rained on her own parade, in effect.
Rocco Siffredi
26-05-17, 16:58
She will be snapped up in an instant , massive following, even if most of them hate her . She certainly creates a lively twitter feed.
Eric the Half a Bee
26-05-17, 19:47
Katie Hopkins was employed because she is controversial, and then people would phone up and argue with her. LBC knew this and they have been fine with people calling up asking her to be sacked. companies like LBC need phone calls to create content.
However LBC are a commercial station, what would have happened is the companies that advertise would have put pressure on LBC to do something otherwise they will pull their advertising. At that point LBC need to do something.
LBC have been fine with members of the public not being happy with Hopkins and Farage broadcasting for a good while now.
LBC need those sorts of characters. The station's social media presence is very strong, thriving in part because of some hosts that can be considered controversial - it gets comments and conversation going. On the other side of the political spectrum is James O'Brien, someone whose comments I tend to align with, but he is able to wind up those on the political right and Brexiters, which generates interest, listeners, calls and, along with all of that, revenue.
Eric the Half a Bee
26-05-17, 19:48
She still does have the right to express her opinion though, just not on the radio anymore.
People need to realise free speech doesn't mean you can say what you want without consequence.
Certainly if it's being said in the public domain.
The spelling on this board is getting worse, we all know it should be pelanty..
Quite how she kept any kind of media work after this article was incredible, especially after the dead child washed up ashore.
'Rescue boats? I'd use gun ships on migrants'
"Show me pictures of coffins, show me bodies floating in water, play violins and show me skinny people looking sad. I still don't care".
Yep. Nasty piece of work
Yep. Nasty piece of work
Her face is as ugly as her persona.
Perhaps some of the public should take part of the blame for MAKING these so called celebrities in the first place.
Things like TOWIE, that Chelksie one, Big Brother and others.
If people didn't watch this shit, then these type of people would never have a platform to preach their bile
100% true
Michael Morris
26-05-17, 22:33
https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/26/heroic-black-humour-hatred-choose-british-values
https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/26/heroic-black-humour-hatred-choose-british-valuesExcellent article. :thumbup:
People need to realise free speech doesn't mean you can say what you want without consequence.
People like you and the Hartley abuse people "without consequence" :facepalm:
The Colonel is right. She can express her views but if they incite violence she will have broken the law and will have to pay a penalty
Everybody has said that.
Croesy Blue
26-05-17, 23:10
People like you and the Hartley abuse people "without consequence" :facepalm:
Fućk off clean shirt
Arfur Europe
26-05-17, 23:16
The spelling on this board is getting worse, we all know it should be pelanty..
Quite how she kept any kind of media work after this article was incredible, especially after the dead child washed up ashore.
'Rescue boats? I'd use gun ships on migrants'
"Show me pictures of coffins, show me bodies floating in water, play violins and show me skinny people looking sad. I still don't care".
She reminds me of an early prototype cyborg a la Westworld. Sent on to the frontline with non human views that the fringes of society can cling on to.
Simarly, Theresa May. Actually, while I'm there, the majority of the Conservative Party. I think this very early v.1 attempt was aborted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzBq0n8dxFQ
Fućk off clean shirt
So what is the difference between you and hartley constantly abusing people and KH?
Everybody has said that.
Yes but the good Colonel is always right.
the other bob wilson
27-05-17, 04:30
Excellent article. :thumbup:
Once again, Ms Hyde gets it spot on - superb writing.
LBC need those sorts of characters. The station's social media presence is very strong, thriving in part because of some hosts that can be considered controversial - it gets comments and conversation going. On the other side of the political spectrum is James O'Brien, someone whose comments I tend to align with, but he is able to wind up those on the political right and Brexiters, which generates interest, listeners, calls and, along with all of that, revenue.
James seems to be permanently miserable. He always sounds like Marvin the paranoid android.
I assume she meant the Nazi "the final solution", which even for her is beyond the point of no return. On the subject of free speech, there have also been some left wing views which need highlighting.
The vice-chair of Stroud Labour Party, Debbie Kicks tweeted>What has happened in Manchester is awful and my thoughts are with the families. However I cant help thinking this is wonderful timing for Theresa May.
Daniel Ewen, vice chair of Esher Labour party, posted>“I’m going on record and saying that I would not put it past our establishment, our ri
ght wing government or Theresa May to blow up their own people in order to continue to secure power for themselves.”
Elizabeth Hayden, a Labour a council candidate Mossley Hill in Liverpool, shared a blog titled ‘Was the Manchester Arena atrocity a ‘false flag’ attack?’. It also went on to say, " there is no doubt that this attack has been highly beneficial to the Tory party.” Both she And Debbie Hix seem to be expressing an opinion that the public trust May more than Corbyn to deal with this sort of thing.
Is it her opinion? Even if she believes what she said the controversial sentence is so unnatural that she has used it deliberately rather than it summing up her personal view.
Don't give them oxygen by talking about them. Or, to avoid irony, at least don't speak their name and give them hits by reading/linking to their comments.
Bluebirdman Of Alcathays
27-05-17, 13:05
Both she And Debbie Hix seem to be expressing an opinion that the public trust May more than Corbyn to deal with this sort of thing.
Or maybe they thought it would play into Tory hands since they love to tap into people's fears.
Or maybe they thought it would play into Tory hands since they love to tap into people's fears.
- May U-turn and that interview with Andrew Neil
- attack in Manchester which stopped campaigning and allowed May to enter more familiar territory due to her previous role
It's not about who would deal with it best (don't forget Corbyn asked about police cuts and was told to dress better and sing the anthem while also look to videos of May rejecting police fears over the impact on intelligence gathering a few years earlier) but that May went from her most difficult time to the country not talking about that at all in such a rapid time.
David Vincent
27-05-17, 14:07
Excellent article. :thumbup:
This so-called excellent article just seems to say that true Britishness is being able to joke about the death of a relative. If that is true then it doesn't say much about the British.
Also it blames Hopkins for not writing about Sandy Hook. She, like most of us, has probably never heard of Sandy Hook.
A Serbian once told me that British reserve and understatement was just cowardice. I think he meant we were just frightened to accept that we are in a war with Islam.
I chat to retired policemen and soldiers and they all seem agreed that this will end up with the army fighting street to street in places like Bolton and Bradford. Perhaps they just lack a sense of humour.
Eric Cartman
27-05-17, 14:13
This so-called excellent article just seems to say that true Britishness is being able to joke about the death of a relative. If that is true then it doesn't say much about the British.
Also it blames Hopkins for not writing about Sandy Hook. She, like most of us, has probably never heard of Sandy Hook.
A Serbian once told me that British reserve and understatement was just cowardice. I think he meant we were just frightened to accept that we are in a war with Islam.
I chat to retired policemen and soldiers and they all seem agreed that this will end up with the army fighting street to street in places like Bolton and Bradford. Perhaps they just lack a sense of humour.
You have never heard of Sandy Hook?
This so-called excellent article just seems to say that true Britishness is being able to joke about the death of a relative. If that is true then it doesn't say much about the British.
Also it blames Hopkins for not writing about Sandy Hook. She, like most of us, has probably never heard of Sandy Hook.
A Serbian once told me that British reserve and understatement was just cowardice. I think he meant we were just frightened to accept that we are in a war with Islam.
I chat to retired policemen and soldiers and they all seem agreed that this will end up with the army fighting street to street in places like Bolton and Bradford. Perhaps they just lack a sense of humour.
Most people haven't heard of Serbia.
David Vincent
27-05-17, 16:35
You have never heard of Sandy Hook?
I remember it now I've looked it up. Why should Hopkins write about it? It happened 5 years ago. Should she also mention The Rape of Nanking or whatever? What a stupid thing for this Guardian journalist to write. I don't know who is more idiotic - the Guardian journalist or those on here who praise her.
CardiffIrish2
27-05-17, 16:38
This so-called excellent article just seems to say that true Britishness is being able to joke about the death of a relative. If that is true then it doesn't say much about the British.
Also it blames Hopkins for not writing about Sandy Hook. She, like most of us, has probably never heard of Sandy Hook.
A Serbian once told me that British reserve and understatement was just cowardice. I think he meant we were just frightened to accept that we are in a war with Islam.
I chat to retired policemen and soldiers and they all seem agreed that this will end up with the army fighting street to street in places like Bolton and Bradford. Perhaps they just lack a sense of humour.
I know a lot of retired Policeman and not one has ever come up with such a ridiculous theory about fighting street to street in Bradford and Bolton.
David Vincent
27-05-17, 19:47
I know a lot of retired Policeman and not one has ever come up with such a ridiculous theory about fighting street to street in Bradford and Bolton.
Judging by your Snowflake persona on here I would guess they don't want to tell you what they really think.
Taunton Blue Genie
27-05-17, 20:50
This so-called excellent article just seems to say that true Britishness is being able to joke about the death of a relative. If that is true then it doesn't say much about the British.
Also it blames Hopkins for not writing about Sandy Hook. She, like most of us, has probably never heard of Sandy Hook.
A Serbian once told me that British reserve and understatement was just cowardice. I think he meant we were just frightened to accept that we are in a war with Islam.
I chat to retired policemen and soldiers and they all seem agreed that this will end up with the army fighting street to street in places like Bolton and Bradford. Perhaps they just lack a sense of humour.
It doesn't sound dissimilar to Enoch Powell's 'Rivers of Blood' speech 50 years ago. That didn't seem to happen, did it?
CardiffIrish2
27-05-17, 20:59
Judging by your Snowflake persona on here I would guess they don't want to tell you what they really think.
Youll be calling me a libtard next.
Always have the Fox news cliche directory close to you fella when writing your posts eh?
Barry Shitpeas
27-05-17, 22:26
https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/26/heroic-black-humour-hatred-choose-british-values
“One day I will say something that takes it so far over the line I will have to go and I accept that too. I think that is part of the condition of living your life on the line.” Living your life on the line … I do like how Katie makes “being a twat on the radio” sound like fighting in ’Nam.
Great line :hehe:
Jordi Culé
28-05-17, 06:49
This so-called excellent article just seems to say that true Britishness is being able to joke about the death of a relative. If that is true then it doesn't say much about the British.
Also it blames Hopkins for not writing about Sandy Hook. She, like most of us, has probably never heard of Sandy Hook.
A Serbian once told me that British reserve and understatement was just cowardice. I think he meant we were just frightened to accept that we are in a war with Islam.
I chat to retired policemen and soldiers and they all seem agreed that this will end up with the army fighting street to street in places like Bolton and Bradford. Perhaps they just lack a sense of humour.
:hehe:
You keep banging your head on the wall buster.
Taunton Blue Genie
28-05-17, 08:07
The American phrase "Shouting fire in a crowded theater" springs to mind with some of these shock-jock types i.e. causing unnecessary panic in the public domain.
Perhaps with her severance pay she can pay for some plastic surgery the ugly minge
This so-called excellent article just seems to say that true Britishness is being able to joke about the death of a relative. If that is true then it doesn't say much about the British.
Also it blames Hopkins for not writing about Sandy Hook. She, like most of us, has probably never heard of Sandy Hook.
A Serbian once told me that British reserve and understatement was just cowardice. I think he meant we were just frightened to accept that we are in a war with Islam.
I chat to retired policemen and soldiers and they all seem agreed that this will end up with the army fighting street to street in places like Bolton and Bradford. Perhaps they just lack a sense of humour.
:hehe: Utter bollocks
Croesy Blue
28-05-17, 15:26
This so-called excellent article just seems to say that true Britishness is being able to joke about the death of a relative. If that is true then it doesn't say much about the British.
Also it blames Hopkins for not writing about Sandy Hook. She, like most of us, has probably never heard of Sandy Hook.
A Serbian once told me that British reserve and understatement was just cowardice. I think he meant we were just frightened to accept that we are in a war with Islam.
I chat to retired policemen and soldiers and they all seem agreed that this will end up with the army fighting street to street in places like Bolton and Bradford. Perhaps they just lack a sense of humour.
I've read some bollocks in my time but Jesus this is pathetic.
David Vincent
28-05-17, 19:46
Youll be calling me a libtard next.
Always have the Fox news cliche directory close to you fella when writing your posts eh?
I don't watch Fox news and nobody I talk to would have heard of it. There are 23,000 Muslim extremists on the watch list. In army terms that is more than a division. They could hold or take any city they want with that many soldiers. It will all kick off when they declare no go zones and Muslim criminals or terrorists use these no go areas as a base.
We have already had no go zones with much smaller groups. In the 1980s parts of Notting Hill were off limits to the police and today there are traveller sites where the police will not enter.
The only way to enter Muslim no go areas will be with the army.
Eric Cartman
28-05-17, 19:51
I don't watch Fox news and nobody I talk to would have heard of it. There are 23,000 Muslim extremists on the watch list. In army terms that is more than a division. They could hold or take any city they want with that many soldiers. It will all kick off when they declare no go zones and Muslim criminals or terrorists use these no go areas as a base.
We have already had no go zones with much smaller groups. In the 1980s parts of Notting Hill were off limits to the police and today there are traveller sites where the police will not enter.
The only way to enter Muslim no go areas will be with the army.
What are they waiting for?
Jordi Culé
28-05-17, 20:03
I don't watch Fox news and nobody I talk to would have heard of it. There are 23,000 Muslim extremists on the watch list. In army terms that is more than a division. They could hold or take any city they want with that many soldiers. It will all kick off when they declare no go zones and Muslim criminals or terrorists use these no go areas as a base.
We have already had no go zones with much smaller groups. In the 1980s parts of Notting Hill were off limits to the police and today there are traveller sites where the police will not enter.
The only way to enter Muslim no go areas will be with the army.
Are you Tommy Robinson/Stephen Yaxley Lennon or Paul Golding?
Build yourself a bunker butt and best give your family cyanide pills for when it goes tits up.
:thumbup:
Have we got a doctor/psychiatrist on the board, not a Muslim one obviously?
Eric the Half a Bee
28-05-17, 20:11
There are 23,000 Muslim extremists on the watch list.
I've seen all the usual right wing outlets reporting this. All of them say the information comes from a Whitehall source. Needless to say I'm sceptical of this until I see names and proof, not just a "Whitehall source".
I don't watch Fox news and nobody I talk to would have heard of it. There are 23,000 Muslim extremists on the watch list. In army terms that is more than a division. They could hold or take any city they want with that many soldiers. It will all kick off when they declare no go zones and Muslim criminals or terrorists use these no go areas as a base.
We have already had no go zones with much smaller groups. In the 1980s parts of Notting Hill were off limits to the police and today there are traveller sites where the police will not enter.
The only way to enter Muslim no go areas will be with the army.
I was talking to someone from the valleys recently he said the last time he came to Cardiff was to swim in the Empire pool.
David Vincent
28-05-17, 20:31
Are you Tommy Robinson/Stephen Yaxley Lennon or Paul Golding?
Build yourself a bunker butt and best give your family cyanide pills for when it goes tits up.
:thumbup:
Have we got a doctor/psychiatrist on the board, not a Muslim one obviously?
I have only heard of one of those names and I am not even sure what he stands for. You are trying to put me in the wrong box. I am just an old fashioned 1960s Labour voter and I still prefer Corbyn to the other candidates but that doesn't stop me from seeing how things are going. I suppose you are a teenager so you must know everything already.
Colonel Cærdiffi
28-05-17, 20:34
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/hero-surgeon-branded-terrorist-in-torrent-of-racist-abuse-hours-after-treating-manchester-bombing-a3550926.html
Jordi Culé
28-05-17, 20:44
FAO: Dai Vin
Teenager? Behave.
Right answer this honestly. Do you think Britain will descend into open warfare between Muslims and non Muslims? That's what you're stating.
As you were.
Excellent article. :thumbup:
Brilliant.
I know Our kate is well loved on this forum, you can all show your appreciation
https://www.change.org/p/l-b-c-we-the-people-support-of-katie-hopkins?recruiter=166981984&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=mob-xs-share_petition-reason_msg
I know Our kate is well loved on this forum, you can all show your appreciation
https://www.change.org/p/l-b-c-we-the-people-support-of-katie-hopkins?recruiter=166981984&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=mob-xs-share_petition-reason_msg
Her other petition.
https://www.change.org/p/devolution-has-failed-bring-back-all-powers-to-westminster
Now the mail are impinging on her freedom of speech.
http://zelo-street.blogspot.sg/2017/06/katie-hopkins-sacked-by-mail-online.html?m=1
I know Our kate is well loved on this forum, you can all show your appreciation
https://www.change.org/p/l-b-c-we-the-people-support-of-katie-hopkins?recruiter=166981984&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=mob-xs-share_petition-reason_msg
Some of the comments...makes us on here look like the Mensa Members forum
Pedro de la Rosa
02-06-17, 10:35
Some of the comments...makes us on here look like the Mensa Members forum
In fairness, she isn't "POLITICALLY CARRECT"
Am I the only one that feels a slight tinge of disappointment after clicking on this thread and finding out she's still alive?
Gwyn Davies signed this petition
I wondered what big gwyn was up to these days..
https://www.change.org/p/l-b-c-we-the-people-support-of-katie-hopkins?recruiter=166981984&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=mob-xs-share_petition-reason_msg
Gwyn Davies signed this petition
I wondered what big gwyn was up to these days..
https://www.change.org/p/l-b-c-we-the-people-support-of-katie-hopkins?recruiter=166981984&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=mob-xs-share_petition-reason_msg
Some of the comments on there are priceless.
Black lives matter ...all lives matter..so the group is aptly named black lives matter .yet they cant be addressed as black people double standards.this country supposedly democratic and yet you cant use the word black.i spoke to someone that makes the teas and coffees for a local council meeting and shes not allowed to ask if people at the meeting would like black tea or coffee because someone was offended.bloody madness pandering to pc idiots.bring back katie.
Like something from an **** party political broadcast.
"she unlike the pussy snowflakes out there isn't scared to say it as it is. if love to see her in no10"
"When I watch police programs on TV it quite obviously shows that her comment is true. The same goes for hospital programs"
"Bloody disgrace, what can't someone write that, what would of have been done if she had wrote ; dear skinhead what are you so full of hate when you fight with yourselves about oppression and suppression"
"Politically Correct went too far here. Restor our lbc presentor. PLEASE."
Jesus, are these actual people?
"she unlike the pussy snowflakes out there isn't scared to say it as it is. if love to see her in no10"
"When I watch police programs on TV it quite obviously shows that her comment is true. The same goes for hospital programs"
"Bloody disgrace, what can't someone write that, what would of have been done if she had wrote ; dear skinhead what are you so full of hate when you fight with yourselves about oppression and suppression"
"Politically Correct went too far here. Restor our lbc presentor. PLEASE."
Jesus, are these actual people?
We are absolutely ****ed as a species.
Its all backwards from here on out.
I have my mad max gear ready to go. Leathers,dodge charger and a dog. All set.
Croesy Blue
02-06-17, 13:00
The way the term snowflake has become an insult used the wrong way is baffling.
The way the term snowflake has become an insult used the wrong way is baffling.
Seems to apply to anyone who isn't a raving nazi
Taunton Blue Genie
02-06-17, 13:59
"she unlike the pussy snowflakes out there isn't scared to say it as it is. if love to see her in no10"
"When I watch police programs on TV it quite obviously shows that her comment is true. The same goes for hospital programs"
"Bloody disgrace, what can't someone write that, what would of have been done if she had wrote ; dear skinhead what are you so full of hate when you fight with yourselves about oppression and suppression"
"Politically Correct went too far here. Restor our lbc presentor. PLEASE."
Jesus, are these actual people?
They are probably peepl
CardiffIrish2
02-06-17, 14:33
Seems to apply to anyone who isn't a raving nazi
Isn't it just? I got called a pussy snow flake on a channel news 4 thread for saying that a lot of intelligence about Islamist radicals comes from within Muslim community.
He was an 18 year old from Mississippi 😃😃
Croesy Blue
02-06-17, 14:50
The thing is being a snowflake just always meant everyone is different. That's somehow been spun into being weak.
Colonel Cærdiffi
02-06-17, 15:07
The thing is being a snowflake just always meant everyone is different. That's somehow been spun into being weak.
No, it's about how precious people can be.
Snowflake really should have dropped out of usage when Michael Gove started saying it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.