View Full Version : City Defender wanted by championship clubs
Perry NG apparently, £3.6 m
One year left on his current contract
https://thetransferroom.com/others/championship-clubs-monitoring-cardiff-city-defender-ahead-of-summer-transfer-window
In other circumstances you'd snatch their hands off.
Can we afford to sell with being able to spend zilch?
It certainly changes the train of thought on deals like this.
You'd usually think take the money we could get a replacement for half that and invest it elsewhere.
Having said that would we? Or would it disappear in the pockets of Vinnie The Long Trousers?
If we could get a few irons in the fire and get some loans without the fee or freebie replacements with that cash spent partly on quality players wages I'd take it all day.
He's decent enough but £3.6m is ridiculous money with a year left on his contract.
In other circumstances you'd snatch their hands off.
Can we afford to sell with being able to spend zilch?
It certainly changes the train of thought on deals like this.
You'd usually think take the money we could get a replacement for half that and invest it elsewhere.
Having said that would we? Or would it disappear in the pockets of Vinnie The Long Trousers?
If we could get a few irons in the fire and get some loans without the fee or freebie replacements with that cash spent partly on quality players wages I'd take it all day.
He's decent enough but £3.6m is ridiculous money with a year left on his contract.
Make your mind up!
In other circumstances you'd snatch their hands off.
Can we afford to sell with being able to spend zilch?
It certainly changes the train of thought on deals like this.
You'd usually think take the money we could get a replacement for half that and invest it elsewhere.
Having said that would we? Or would it disappear in the pockets of Vinnie The Long Trousers?
There are many reasons to complain about Vincent Tan - and you have covered all of them, and more, with tedious persistence.
But trousering transfer fees isn't one of them.
Your other post (#3) is more to the point.
That said, I don't believe the £3.6m speculation for one minute.
The Lone Gunman
13-04-23, 22:11
Vaulks to Norwich springs to mind.
that would be a good return on someone we bought for 350k.
it would show the benefits of targeting younger players from lower leagues, rather than sticking with 30 year old cart horses like we used to.
The Lone Gunman
13-04-23, 22:15
that would be a good return on someone we bought for 350k.
it would show the benefits of targeting younger players from lower leagues, rather than sticking with 30 year old cart horses like we used to.
It's also the stuff of fantasy.
Vaulks to Norwich springs to mind.
Josh Murphy to Chelsea summer 2019!
No one is paying £3.6M for Perry NG.
the other bob wilson
14-04-23, 04:25
There are many reasons to complain about Vincent Tan - and you have covered all of them, and more, with tedious persistence.
But trousering transfer fees isn't one of them.
Your other post (#3) is more to the point.
That said, I don't believe the £3.6m speculation for one minute.
My thoughts exactly - half of that possibly, but he’s only got a year on his deal left. I reckon there’s a chance we’d accept half of the sum mentioned as well - even if we stay up, you can only see more bargain basement transfer dealing ahead.
actually reading the article, it doesn't say that anyone is contemplating offering us £3.6m for Ng at all.
it says clubs are interested in him, and on transfermarkt.com he has a value of "about £3.6m" (actually €3.5m).
actually reading the article, it doesn't say that anyone is contemplating offering us £3.6m for Ng at all.
it says clubs are interested in him, and on transfermarkt.com he has a value of "about £3.6m" (actually €3.5m).
Alex Wallace is a kid pretending to be a journalist who comes out with utter bollocks.
Alex Wallace is a kid pretending to be a journalist who comes out with utter bollocks.
His journalist credentials are probably no worse than most these days TBH , anyway , my initial impression was that the article would have been about McGuinness , not him, and I think of all our players he will go before anyone else.
Not sure how much a fee McGuiness would attract though giving that his contract is only for another 12 months
A Quiet Monkfish
14-04-23, 07:45
That's £1.3m per lettter !
Make your mind up!
That's the dilemma though isn't it.
How interested are people in coming here?
How willing are PL clubs and the like to let players come here with no loan fee changing hands?
All dependent on them things before you make a decision.
If I know this club though they're out there now though doing the research and putting in the footwork so we don't get caught out in the summer.
There are many reasons to complain about Vincent Tan - and you have covered all of them, and more, with tedious persistence.
But trousering transfer fees isn't one of them.
Your other post (#3) is more to the point.
That said, I don't believe the £3.6m speculation for one minute.
Where did the money for Moore go?
Was he adequately replaced?
Why people feel the need to tell other posters what their opinion on here should be I don't know. It is an opinion.
You've got yours, I've got mine.
The Prophet of Doom
14-04-23, 07:58
It does not matter how much we sell anyone for, we cannot spend any money for two more transfer windows. Whilst not as bad as a points deduction this penalty is now beginning to bite and fans need to remember it is a punishment and will impact on the quality of the squad for the next 12 months whatever league we are in and whoever we sell...
2023/4 is going to be a challenge whichever way you look at it.
Any transfers received will simply go towards reducing our financial woes.
NottinghamBlue
14-04-23, 08:21
Where did the money for Moore go?
It would have covered two weeks of our losses.
It would have covered two weeks of our losses.
That is my point.
If it isn't going to be used to bolster the squad in Amy way then it achieves very little for the manager.
In that case I'd keep him.
Yes, so that's what I mean by pocketed by
Where did the money for Moore go?
Was he adequately replaced?
Why people feel the need to tell other posters what their opinion on here should be I don't know. It is an opinion.
You've got yours, I've got mine.
Moore wanted to leave though , so there was no point paying wages , rental fees , medical bills, insurance, and everything else that a modern football player costs , so when you include everything £4.5 m was about right.
As with many transfers , it’s the fact that cash comes into the club that’s is the important thing not just the amount of the fee.
Didn't we sign 5 players on loan that January? That wouldn't have been cheap
Moore wanted to leave though , so there was no point paying wages , rental fees , medical bills, insurance, and everything else that a modern football player costs , so when you include everything £4.5 m was about right.
As with many transfers , it’s the fact that cash comes into the club that’s is the important thing not just the amount of the fee.
Whether players want to leave or not you have to have some idea of what you're doing after it.
Once again here the club acted as if the Moore situation took them by surprise. The replacements that followed were nowhere near of the same standard or had any potential to be.
If you let players leave and not have a good enough plan for what you're going to do after them then you're heading only one way as a club.
Adequate planning across the board seems to be an alien concept at City.
Whether players want to leave or not you have to have some idea of what you're doing after it.
Once again here the club acted as if the Moore situation took them by surprise. The replacements that followed were nowhere near of the same standard or had any potential to be.
If you let players leave and not have a good enough plan for what you're going to do after them then you're heading only one way as a club.
Adequate planning across the board seems to be an alien concept at City.
Jordan Hugill had an immediate impact. His first game was far better than Moore had been all season and scored on debut in a vital win I think v Forest.
Whether players want to leave or not you have to have some idea of what you're doing after it.
Once again here the club acted as if the Moore situation took them by surprise. The replacements that followed were nowhere near of the same standard or had any potential to be.
If you let players leave and not have a good enough plan for what you're going to do after them then you're heading only one way as a club.
Adequate planning across the board seems to be an alien concept at City.
Funnily enough I do have some idea as the money is referenced on the statement of financial position. Another thing, Tan is keeping the club solvent from what I can see. Have you a short term memory as not so long ago we faced the possibility of being wound up due to arrears with HMRC.
I don’t think the club were surprised by Moore leaving as they turned down a late bid from Wolves earlier in the season.
Why people feel the need to tell other posters what their opinion on here should be I don't know. It is an opinion.
You've got yours, I've got mine.
:hehe:
As if all your posts are not pushing your opinion on other posters? I love a bit of extreme irony.
5521
:hehe:
As if all your posts are not pushing your opinion on other posters? I love a bit of extreme irony.
5521
It's my opinion.
How am I pushing it on others? If you can't see that our board couldn't run a bath then you're beyond help.
Jordan Hugill had an immediate impact. His first game was far better than Moore had been all season and scored on debut in a vital win I think v Forest.
He did yeah.
Where is he again?
I am talking an actual replacement. Not a cheap stop gap.
Der Kaiser
14-04-23, 10:48
No one is paying £3.6M for Perry NG.
If we ask Chelsea nicely they might give us £30 million for him
Funnily enough I do have some idea as the money is referenced on the statement of financial position. Another thing, Tan is keeping the club solvent from what I can see. Have you a short term memory as not so long ago we faced the possibility of being wound up due to arrears with HMRC.
I don’t think the club were surprised by Moore leaving as they turned down a late bid from Wolves earlier in the season.
He is yeah. Dalman and Tan tell us often enough.
They seem to over egg how much they pay to keep us solvent but then that's their choice isn't it.
The club never replaced more with anything close to the same quality and never looked like doing outside of short term loans.
In this instance, taking money for NG with no intention of using some of it to replace him (with wages for a loan or freebie) would be a mistake.
It's all nonsense anyway. As many have pointed out, nobody is paying that amount.
He is yeah. Dalman and Tan tell us often enough.
They seem to over egg how much they pay to keep us solvent but then that's their choice isn't it.
The club never replaced more with anything close to the same quality and never looked like doing outside of short term loans.
In this instance, taking money for NG with no intention of using some of it to replace him (with wages for a loan or freebie) would be a mistake.
It's all nonsense anyway. As many have pointed out, nobody us paying that amount.
Nobody has paid that amount , but someone might , it’s all guesswork and I think he’s worth up to £3/4m
Bobby Dandruff
14-04-23, 11:30
No one is paying £3.6M for Perry NG.
He can play in goal as well remember...... :thumbup:
Bobby Dandruff
14-04-23, 11:32
:hehe:
As if all your posts are not pushing your opinion on other posters? I love a bit of extreme irony.
5521
On a different note......I went to Lake Tahoe for the first week of my honeymoon.
But didn't iron at the top of a mountain.
J R Hartley
14-04-23, 13:03
Why people feel the need to tell other posters what their opinion on here should be I don't know. It is an opinion.
You've got yours, I've got mine.
:hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::h ehe:
The irony meter just smashed into a gazillion pieces :hehe:
:hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::hehe::h ehe:
The irony meter just smashed into a gazillion pieces :hehe:
Said you. :hehe:
Lay off that Madri this weekend.
J R Hartley
14-04-23, 13:57
Said you. :hehe:
Lay off that Madri this weekend.
Not a chance:hehe:
Rhondda tonight for a gentlemens evening with ex Cardiff City players and Weston Super Mare tomorrow to watch the mighty Martyrs.
Perry NG apparently, £3.6 m
One year left on his current contract
https://thetransferroom.com/others/championship-clubs-monitoring-cardiff-city-defender-ahead-of-summer-transfer-window
No chance, the kids garbage. more like 36p
Not a chance:hehe:
Rhondda tonight for a gentlemens evening with ex Cardiff City players and Weston Super Mare tomorrow to watch the mighty Martyrs.
Have a good un.
The Lone Gunman
14-04-23, 14:12
Let’s be honest, there are very few Championship clubs who could afford to pay £3 million-plus for a defender and none of those who could would want to buy Perry Ng.
Re-Reworked
14-04-23, 14:19
Made up story by made up Cardiff fan and awful twitter account
Canton Kev
14-04-23, 14:26
That's £1.3m per lettter !
Uh...
WJ99mobile
14-04-23, 15:00
There’s no chance that anyone’s paying 3.6m in this market. A few seasons ago maybe but not any more.
And every championship team should be looking at every other championship player, it’s their job
Looks a steal at £3m at present does NG
Let’s be honest, there are very few Championship clubs who could afford to pay £3 million-plus for a defender and none of those who could would want to buy Perry Ng.
You sure about that
light up the darkness
19-04-24, 11:55
Uh...
I was also trying to work it out.
Best I got was £9.1 million but that doesn’t seem to be right ��
WJ99mobile
19-04-24, 12:03
Anything £3m+ we need to take.
The Lone Gunman
19-04-24, 15:17
You sure about that
Yes, I'm 100% sure that back in April 2023 there were very few Championship clubs who could afford to pay £3 million-plus for a defender and none of those who could wanted to buy Perry Ng.
You know he's still here, right? Or do you reckon he was maybe sold to another Championship club last summer for £3 million-plus, loaned back to City on the quiet, and all that business about him allegedly signing a new contract in August was staged by the media department for dramatic purposes?
Yes, I'm 100% sure that back in April 2023 there were very few Championship clubs who could afford to pay £3 million-plus for a defender and none of those who could wanted to buy Perry Ng.
You know he's still here, right? Or do you reckon he was maybe sold to another Championship club last summer for £3 million-plus, loaned back to City on the quiet, and all that business about him allegedly signing a new contract in August was staged by the media department for dramatic purposes?
In the final paragraph it could have been , you’re right on that. Is that the only thing you have in your locker these days?
J R Hartley
19-04-24, 15:20
Or do you reckon he was maybe sold to another Championship club last summer for £3 million-plus, loaned back to City on the quiet, and all that business about him allegedly signing a new contract in August was staged by the media department for dramatic purposes?
Savage :hehe:
Savage :hehe:
How is it savage, you baby, FFS
The Lone Gunman
19-04-24, 15:24
In the final paragraph it could have been , you’re right on that. Is that the only thing you have in your locker these days?
I don't have a locker. Neither do I have a clue why you're bumping an old thread from a year ago when what was suggested might happen obviously didn't happen. Very odd behaviour.
I don't have a locker. Neither do I have a clue why you're bumping an old thread from a year ago when what was suggested might happen obviously didn't happen. Very odd behaviour.
So, bumping up a topical thread on a message-board ( which you have done on numerous occasions) is now odd behaviour yet you think regurgitating a post by me about the media impact on transfers isn’t , yet you continue to do so time and time again. Even odder behaviour I’d say.
J R Hartley
19-04-24, 15:33
How is it savage, you baby, FFS
Becuase it clearly winds you up and you cant take it. Why else do you think people do it?. If you stopped biting people would stop using it against you.
The Lone Gunman
19-04-24, 15:35
So, bumping up a topical thread on a message-board ( which you have done on numerous occasions) is now odd behaviour yet you think regurgitating a post by me about the media impact on transfers isn’t , yet you continue to do so time and time again. Even odder behaviour I’d say.
You bumped this thread and quoted me in yet another desperate attempt to make me look daft, but sadly you didn't think it through.
We're a further twelve months down the line. We don't even know who'll be playing in the Championship next season, let alone what sort of finances they'll have available to them or what sort of players they'll be looking to sign. But what we do know with 100% certainty is that nobody paid £3 million-plus for Perry Ng last year and the suggestions that anyone would were proved to be fanciful at best.
You’re never wrong are you , that’s a racing certainty.
The Lone Gunman
19-04-24, 15:51
You’re never wrong are you , that’s a racing certainty.
I'm wrong frequently. But not on this occasion.
:thumbup:
I'm wrong frequently. But not on this occasion.
:thumbup:
Fair enough:hehe:
Wales-Bales
19-04-24, 17:35
If we ask Chelsea nicely they might give us £30 million for himChelsea's transfer policy is to never pay less than £70m for player.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.